[OIDFSC] Fwd: FW: Proposal to create the OpenID OAuth Hybrid Working Group

[David Recordon]

Hi Nat,
The wiki just creates the numbered "table of contents" based off of the
order of the headings on the page.  4.1 doesn't actually prescribe an order
of the information, just that all of the information listed in A and B are
there.  As far as I can tell, all of that information is in the proposal.
So yes, having a similar structure is a good thing though I'm able to easily
read and understand this proposal.

--David

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:31 AM, Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com> wrote:

> Maybe I am a formalist, but I think it is better for the WG proposal to
> follow exactly the structure and the numbering scheme layed out in the
> OpenID Process document Article 4.1 so that we will get a consitent format
> for every WGs.
>
> One of the failing reason for the spec concil not issuing recommendation is
> exactly this. (Article 4.2 (a)).
> SInce it is just a formatting issue, it is better to do it.
>
> =nat
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>wrote:
>
>> +1 from me as well.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: specs-council-bounces at openid.net [mailto:
>> specs-council-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf Of Josh Hoyt
>> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:54 PM
>> To: specs-council at openid.net
>> Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Fwd: FW: Proposal to create the OpenID OAuth Hybrid
>> Working Group
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:29 PM, David Recordon <recordond at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I am +1 for approving this proposal.
>>
>> Also +1 from me.
>>
>> j3h
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/attachments/20090113/5f560044/attachment-0002.htm>