[OIDFSC] Fwd: FW: Proposal to create the OpenID OAuth Hybrid Working Group

[Nat Sakimura]

Maybe I am a formalist, but I think it is better for the WG proposal to
follow exactly the structure and the numbering scheme layed out in the
OpenID Process document Article 4.1 so that we will get a consitent format
for every WGs.

One of the failing reason for the spec concil not issuing recommendation is
exactly this. (Article 4.2 (a)).
SInce it is just a formatting issue, it is better to do it.

=nat

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>wrote:

> +1 from me as well.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: specs-council-bounces at openid.net [mailto:
> specs-council-bounces at openid.net] On Behalf Of Josh Hoyt
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 1:54 PM
> To: specs-council at openid.net
> Subject: Re: [OIDFSC] Fwd: FW: Proposal to create the OpenID OAuth Hybrid
> Working Group
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:29 PM, David Recordon <recordond at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I am +1 for approving this proposal.
>
> Also +1 from me.
>
> j3h
>
>


-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/attachments/20090113/ae435b90/attachment-0002.htm>