[OIDFSC] [VOTE] Contract Exchange Working Group Proposal

[Dick Hardt]

+1

On 29-Jan-09, at 6:20 PM, Allen Tom wrote:

> +1
>
> Definitely would like to be supportive of all the very advanced use  
> cases for OpenID in Japan. Hopefully CX wan be used as a reference  
> for the rest of the world when we catch up.
>
> Allen
>
> Mike Jones wrote:
>>
>> With these changes, +1.
>>
>> 				-- Mike
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David Recordon [mailto:recordond at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 11:12 AM
>> To: Brad Fitzpatrick; Dick Hardt; Mike Jones; Johnny Bufu; Josh  
>> Hoyt; Allen Tom
>> Cc: specs-council at openid.net
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Contract Exchange Working Group Proposal
>>
>> +1 to recommending this working group proposal.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 11:09 AM, David Recordon  
>> <recordond at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Since we've had so many different threads on this proposal, I'd like
>>> to have one final thread where there is a clear vote held on the
>>> latest revision of the proposal.  The proposal can be found at
>>> http://wiki.openid.net/Working_Groups%3AContract_Exchange_1 and in  
>>> the
>>> email below.  If you're a member of the Specs Council, please  
>>> respond
>>> ASAP.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> --David
>>>
>>> (i) WG name
>>> Contract Exchange Extension Working Group
>>>
>>> (ii) Purpose
>>> The purpose of this WG is to produce a standard OpenID extension to
>>> the OpenID Authentication protocol that enables arbitrary parties to
>>> create and exchange a mutually-digitally-signed "contract". This
>>> contract can be both broadband and mobile friendly through  
>>> appropriate
>>> bindings that will be defined for each use case.
>>>
>>> (iii) Scope
>>> Development of a specification that allows parties to exchange a
>>> mutually-digitally-signed contract leveraging on OpenID  
>>> Authentication
>>> 2.0 and OpenID Attribute Exchange 2.0 via the appropriate bindings
>>> defined in the specification.
>>>
>>> Out of scope
>>>
>>>    * UI and user experience: The Working Group will develop the wire
>>> protocol and and any related processing mechanisms required to  
>>> support
>>> it but user interface and experience is out of scope.
>>>    * Public Key Discovery method: This functionality will be either
>>> defined in the XRD 1.0 specification currently in progress at the
>>> OASIS XRI TC or a mechanism that works with OpenID Authentication
>>> 2.0/2.1 discovery will be defined independently.
>>>    * Terms negotiation: Actual negotiation of the terms of a  
>>> contract
>>> should be dealt with out-of-band or by other specifications.
>>>    * Assurance: These will be handled by third-party assurance
>>> programs or other identity governance frameworks.
>>>    * Trust hierarchies. It is the intent that this specification be
>>> usable by any trust community, whether it uses conventional PKI
>>> hierarchies, peer-to-peer trust mechanisms, reputation systems, or
>>> other forms of trust assurance. The specification of any particular
>>> trust root, trust hierarchy, or trust policy is explicitly out of
>>> scope.
>>>
>>> (iv) Proposed List of Specifications
>>>    * Contract Exchange 1.0 - Expected completion of the first
>>> iteration is in Q1 2009.
>>>
>>> (v) Anticipated audience or users of the work
>>> Implementers of OpenID Providers and Relying Parties, especially  
>>> those
>>> who require security and accountability features to exchange  
>>> sensitive
>>> customer information (e.g. personally identifiable information and
>>> credit card numbers) responsibly among trusted parties.
>>>
>>> (vi) Language in which the WG will conduct business
>>> English.
>>>
>>> (vii) Method of work
>>> E-mail discussions on the working group mailing list, working group
>>> conference calls, and possibly face-to-face meetings at conferences.
>>>
>>> (viii) Basis for determining when the work of the WG is completed
>>> Drafts will be evaluated on the basis of whether they increase or
>>> decrease consensus within the working group. The work will be
>>> completed once it is apparent that maximal consensus on the drafts  
>>> has
>>> been achieved, consistent with the purpose and scope.
>>>
>>> (b) Background Information.
>>> (i) Related work being done by other WGs or organizations
>>>    * OpenID Authentication 2.1 [AN]
>>>    * OpenID Attribute Exchange Extension 2.0 [AX]
>>>    * LIberty Alliance Identity Governance Framework [IGF] 1.0 Draft
>>>    * XML Advanced Electronic Signatures [XAdES]
>>>    * WS-Trust 1.3 [WS-trust]
>>>    * XRI 2.0 and XRI 3.0 [XRI]
>>>    * XRD 1.0 [XRI]
>>>    * XDI 1.0 [XDI]
>>>    * Vendor Relationship Management [VRM]
>>>
>>> (ii) Proposers
>>>    * Drummond Reed, =drummond, drummond.reed at parity.com,
>>> Cordance/Parity/OASIS (U.S.A)
>>>    * Henrik Biering, hb at netamia.com, Netamia (Denmark)
>>>    * Hideki Nara, hdknr at ic-tact.co.jp, Tact Communications (Japan)
>>>    * John Bradeley, jbradley at mac.com, OASIS IDTrust Member Section  
>>> (Canada)
>>>    * Mike Graves, mgraves at janrain.com, JanRain, Inc. (U.S.A.)
>>>    * Nat Sakimura, n-sakimura at nri.co.jp, Nomura Research  
>>> Institute, Ltd.(Japan)
>>>    * Robert Ott, robert.ott at clavid.com, Clavid (Switzerland)
>>>    * Tatsuki Sakushima, tatsuki at nri.com, NRI America, Inc. (U.S.A.)
>>>    * Toru Yamaguchi, trymch at gmail.com, DeNA Co. Ltd.  (Japan)
>>>
>>> Editors:
>>> Nat Sakimura, n-sakimura at nri.co.jp, Nomura Research Institute, Ltd.
>>>
>>> (iii) Anticipated Contributions
>>>    * Sakimura, N., et. al "OpenID Trusted data eXchange Extention
>>> Specification (draft)", Oct. 2008. [TX2008].
>>>
>>>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/attachments/20090202/69fa7b63/attachment-0001.htm>