[OIDFSC] Could you update me of the status of CX WG proposal?

[David Recordon]

Replying here as well...

Hey Nat,
I think you can see from the discussion the past few days on the specs- 
council@ mailing list, the growing consensus is that the proposal is  
still too complex and needs to be simplified.

As to the OASIS comment, this isn't a standards body that is  
interested in doing any sort of work that comes along.  It must be  
related to OpenID which is why I think we're seeing this process take  
more time.  Also see the discussion from last week on the board@  
mailing list about how we could make it easier for people to get  
started though still be a hurdle before calling their work "OpenID".

I'll figure out how to get your messages to the specs-council list,  
there really isn't a good reason for it to be members only versus  
allowing the specs council to work with proposers to turn their  
proposals into something that can be approved IMHO.

--David

On Dec 23, 2008, at 1:23 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote:

> Now almost a week has passed and I am pinging again in the hope that  
> I will get something before Xmas.
>
> Sorry to bug you guys, but I feel I have to to get the process  
> moving...
>
> It is 40 days since the revision, and 55 days since the first it has  
> been submit...
> It is taking way too long. Starting a TC at OASIS seems to be much  
> easier.
> That's not what we should be. We should be lighter weight and nimble.
>
> # I am sending it to specs-council at openid.net and CCing the members  
> and general list because specs-council seems to be a members only  
> moderated list.
>
> =nat
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt at gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
> On 17-Dec-08, at 6:17 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Could you kindly update me of the status of CX WG proposal?
> People are waiting for it.
>
> Also, I think it is a really good idea to set up a ML for spec  
> council so that people can mail the spec council collectively.
> I am emailing to David, Dick and Josh just because I happen to have  
> found them easily in my addressbook.
> I wanted to email to the entire spec council, really.
>
> I thought David was going to create a list for spec council.
>
> Nat: I also cc'ed Mike Jones and Johnny -- the other two members of  
> the specs council
>
> -- Dick
>
>
>
> -- 
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/attachments/20081223/4e800287/attachment-0002.htm>