[OIDFSC] Could you update me of the status of CX WG proposal?
David Recordon
recordond at gmail.com
Tue Dec 23 17:52:12 UTC 2008
Hey Nat,
I think you can see from the discussion the past few days on the
specs-council@ mailing list, the growing consensus is that the proposal is
still too complex and needs to be simplified.
As to the OASIS comment, this isn't a standards body that is interested in
doing any sort of work that comes along. It must be related to OpenID which
is why I think we're seeing this process take more time. Also see the
discussion from last week on the board@ mailing list about how we could make
it easier for people to get started though still be a hurdle before calling
their work "OpenID".
I'll figure out how to get your messages to the specs-council list, there
really isn't a good reason for it to be members only versus allowing the
specs council to work with proposers to turn their proposals into something
that can be approved.
--David
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com> wrote:
> Now almost a week has passed and I am pinging again in the hope that I will
> get something before Xmas.
>
> Sorry to bug you guys, but I feel I have to to get the process moving...
>
> It is 40 days since the revision, and 55 days since the first it has been
> submit...
> It is taking way too long. Starting a TC at OASIS seems to be much easier.
> That's not what we should be. We should be lighter weight and nimble.
>
> # I am sending it to specs-council at openid.net and CCing the members and
> general list because specs-council seems to be a members only moderated
> list.
>
> =nat
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 17-Dec-08, at 6:17 PM, Nat Sakimura wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>>
>>> Could you kindly update me of the status of CX WG proposal?
>>> People are waiting for it.
>>>
>>> Also, I think it is a really good idea to set up a ML for spec council so
>>> that people can mail the spec council collectively.
>>> I am emailing to David, Dick and Josh just because I happen to have found
>>> them easily in my addressbook.
>>> I wanted to email to the entire spec council, really.
>>>
>>
>> I thought David was going to create a list for spec council.
>>
>> Nat: I also cc'ed Mike Jones and Johnny -- the other two members of the
>> specs council
>>
>> -- Dick
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-council/attachments/20081223/13c9c4c8/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the specs-council
mailing list