Spec draft is attached. As a side note, we should make sure that anything contributed to the Foundation's GitHub account is treated in the same manner as the Foundation's SVN server.<div><br></div><div>Agreed with John about this being bound to the domain.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I'm not convinced that splitting the id and domain is that much better than using an acct URI.</div><div><br></div><div>--David</div><div><br><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Nat Sakimura <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sakimura@gmail.com">sakimura@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">At the OpenID Summit, there were some discussion about how to uniquely identify the user. <div><br></div><div>There were some argument that it should user 'user_id' and 'domain'. </div>
<div>Upon some contemplation, I think we should use something like 'server_id' which is a unique identifier (perhaps domain, but maybe UUID etc.) instead of 'domain' as 'domain' may actually change. </div>
<div><br></div><div>What do you think? </div><div><br></div><div>P.S., David, could you just save your html connect proposal to a file and send it to this list? Then it will constitute the contribution and we can start discussion on that formally. Otherwise, we cannot from the IPR management point of view. <br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Nat Sakimura (=nat)<br><a href="http://www.sakimura.org/en/" target="_blank">http://www.sakimura.org/en/</a><br><a href="http://twitter.com/_nat_en" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/_nat_en</a><br>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
openid-specs-connect mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:openid-specs-connect@lists.openid.net">openid-specs-connect@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-connect" target="_blank">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-connect</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>