IIW

[John Bradley]

It would be nice to have a draft contributed to the WG as a starting point.

Are you in a position to do that with the version on openidconnect.com?

We would all like to contribute to the next draft.

I don't want to slow the process but it seems to have been dormant for a while.  

Having revisions for IIW and the summit is a good goal.

For AB we have been iterating about a draft a week for the last several months getting ready for IIW.
That includes revisions to signing and encryption.

I look forward to seeing your changes.

John B.
On 2010-10-13, at 10:17 PM, David Recordon wrote:

> I'm planning to work off of http://openidconnect.com/ and http://wiki.openid.net/Future-OpenID-Technical-Requirements.
> 
> Also going to give a lot of weight to Chuck's feedback since he's actually implemented the crazy early draft.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Breno de Medeiros <breno at google.com> wrote:
> Since you're starting to write the draft, would it be helpful to share
> a skeleton in this list? The earlier we have community input, the more
> we can be confident that a draft will require only agreement on
> specific points that can be ironed out in a meeting or two.
> 
> Also, we still need to elect the chair for this work, as John mentioned.
> 
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 17:23, David Recordon <recordond at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Planning to write the next draft next week. Hope we can do one iteration on
> > the list before the summit. Then at the summit walk through it paragraph by
> > paragraph to have our open issues list.
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Breno de Medeiros <breno at google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> + 1
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 16:43, John Bradley <ve7jtb at ve7jtb.com> wrote:
> >> > This list has been quiet for a while.
> >> >
> >> > I understand fromDavid that he is working on a new draft for IIW.
> >> >
> >> > We should elect some chairs and start doing the work on the list.
> >> >
> >> > Nat and I have been continuing work on artifact binding, in that work
> >> > group.
> >> >
> >> > We should take some time at the tech summit coming up to discuss
> >> > possible harmonization.
> >> >
> >> > We both have people proceeding with implementing draft specs.
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> > John B.
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > openid-specs-connect mailing list
> >> > openid-specs-connect at lists.openid.net
> >> > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-connect
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> --Breno
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> openid-specs-connect mailing list
> >> openid-specs-connect at lists.openid.net
> >> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-connect
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openid-specs-connect mailing list
> > openid-specs-connect at lists.openid.net
> > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-connect
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> --Breno
> _______________________________________________
> openid-specs-connect mailing list
> openid-specs-connect at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-connect
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openid-specs-connect mailing list
> openid-specs-connect at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-connect

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-connect/attachments/20101013/fce4cb4d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4767 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-connect/attachments/20101013/fce4cb4d/attachment.bin>