[Openid-specs-authzen] Agenda for Sep 11, 2025

[Michiel Trimpe]

Yes. We discussed that we’d make both the paths and PDP metadata RECOMMENDED and only make it a MUST that they are consistent (i.e. path MUST be what is specified in metadata *if* defined.)

Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Openid-specs-authzen <openid-specs-authzen-bounces at lists.openid.net> on behalf of Lombardo, Jeff via Openid-specs-authzen <openid-specs-authzen at lists.openid.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2025 7:06:43 PM
To: AuthZEN Working Group List <openid-specs-authzen at lists.openid.net>
Cc: Lombardo, Jeff <jeffsec at amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-authzen] Agenda for Sep 11, 2025


Good for my side with George proposal.



Just checking we aimed to say MUST but switched to RECOMMENDED. Is this the expectation?



Jean-François “Jeff” Lombardo | Amazon Web Services



Architecte Principal de Solutions, Spécialiste de Sécurité
Principal Solution Architect, Security Specialist
Montréal, Canada

( +1 514 778 5565


Commentaires à propos de notre échange? Exprimez-vous ici<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/feedback.aws.amazon.com/?ea=jeffsec&fn=Jean*20Francois&ln=Lombardo__;JQ!!Pe07N362zA!0k9CkAV8Djpw_8EfIAKrbhP3TQrJr0oMnznlUgBJ3V3NoEk6hihx7dNHnQuejn6SSH2CP8Iow3G-tTzppHeg$>.



Thoughts on our interaction? Provide feedback here<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/feedback.aws.amazon.com/?ea=jeffsec&fn=Jean*20Francois&ln=Lombardo__;JQ!!Pe07N362zA!0k9CkAV8Djpw_8EfIAKrbhP3TQrJr0oMnznlUgBJ3V3NoEk6hihx7dNHnQuejn6SSH2CP8Iow3G-tTzppHeg$>.



From: Openid-specs-authzen <openid-specs-authzen-bounces at lists.openid.net> On Behalf Of george--- via Openid-specs-authzen
Sent: September 11, 2025 12:37 PM
To: AuthZEN Working Group List <openid-specs-authzen at lists.openid.net>
Cc: george at practicalidentity.com; AuthZEN Working Group List <openid-specs-authzen at lists.openid.net>
Subject: RE: [EXT] [Openid-specs-authzen] Agenda for Sep 11, 2025



CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.



AVERTISSEMENT: Ce courrier électronique provient d’un expéditeur externe. Ne cliquez sur aucun lien et n’ouvrez aucune pièce jointe si vous ne pouvez pas confirmer l’identité de l’expéditeur et si vous n’êtes pas certain que le contenu ne présente aucun risque.



If there are issues with PR 367, please add them to the PR and I will address. I won’t be able to join today as I’ll be on the DC metro :)



--

George Fletcher

Practical Identity LLC



On Sep 11, 2025, at 12:27 PM, gerry gebel via Openid-specs-authzen <openid-specs-authzen at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-authzen at lists.openid.net>> wrote:



  *   There have been a few working sessions focusing on the IDP interop scenario for the Gartner IAM conference. Let's review the latest changes and thanks to those who have attended these sessions
  *   Pull request 367: addressing issues 358 and 359
  *   Pull request 366: a second proposal regarding offset



Regards,

Gerry

--
Openid-specs-authzen mailing list
Openid-specs-authzen at lists.openid.net<mailto:Openid-specs-authzen at lists.openid.net>
https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-authzen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-authzen/attachments/20250911/2b71096c/attachment-0001.htm>