[Openid-specs-authzen] notes from Aug 14 call
gerry gebel
ggebel at gmail.com
Thu Aug 14 20:46:24 UTC 2025
Attendees
- Michiel Trimpe
- Vladi Berger
- David Brossard
- Julio Auto De Medeiros
- Gerry Gebel
<#Agenda>Agenda
- Remaining open PRs and issues
- Review Gartner interop scenario
- Gartner report mention of AuthZEN
<#Notes>Notes
-
Issues
- 343 closed
- 352: HTTPS binding paths are non normative. We have several
options
- Keep the spec as is (paths are not normative)
- Add a section in the HTTPS bindings that defines normative paths
for evaluation, evaluations, and search
- Julio suggests that we could make the metadata endpoint
mandatory in the spec rather than optional which would cancel
the need for
normative paths in the spec.
- 339: phrasing of the 4-tuple in the spec –> we agreed to update the
phrasing. See issue <https://github.com/openid/authzen/issues/339>
- 348: we approved the new wording and merged it into the spec.
- Issue 325 <https://github.com/openid/authzen/issues/325> is still
open. We had a PR that attempted to address pagination but it
mixed it with
the reasonobject. Calling @alexbabeanu
<https://hackmd.io/@alexbabeanu> and @gertd <https://hackmd.io/@gertd>
: were you working on a new PR?
- Issue 250 <https://github.com/openid/authzen/issues/250>: we need
more feedback from this group in order to proceed. All, please read the
issue from top to bottom. We will discuss on the next call.
- Issue 230 <https://github.com/openid/authzen/issues/230>: we need a
volunteer to write a proposal for the statistics metadata for the Search
APIs. The same applies to issue 229
<https://github.com/openid/authzen/issues/229>.
-
Gartner report mention of AuthZEN
- Innovation Insight: Authorization Management
Platforms, id number G00828568
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-authzen/attachments/20250814/2f837935/attachment.htm>
More information about the Openid-specs-authzen
mailing list