<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#467886;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:11.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#467886" vlink="#96607D" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Spec Call Notes 14-Oct-24<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Aaron Parecki<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mike Jones<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Nat Sakimura<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tom Jones<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sam Goto<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Nat brought up adoption of the Federation Wallet spec<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Giuseppe updated the spec to address the additional feedback that had come in<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> See the current version at <a href="https://peppelinux.github.io/federation-wallet/main.html">
https://peppelinux.github.io/federation-wallet/main.html</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Giuseppe asked Joseph and Brian for early reviews before contributing it again<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Joseph responded positively; Brian hasn't responded yet<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We decided to wait a week for Brian's review and then contribute it if none is received<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mike brought up adoption of the RP Metadata Choices spec<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> It was contributed two weeks ago<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <a href="https://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/2024-September/010447.html">
https://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/2024-September/010447.html</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> In discussion since that, it was agreed that we need to clarify that multiple choices are not to be used in DCR responses<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> On the call, we discussed that it would be fine to do this after adoption<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nat plans to send a call for adoption later today<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">OpenID4VP Implementer's Draft<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The plan has changed to create an Implementer's Draft of OpenID4VP in December<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Rather than a final 1.0 specification<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> This will allow us to add a new query language and gain implementation experience with it<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Before taking the specification to Final status<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tom has a different new query language proposal<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1n7HobJ6QTsNld5rn1uuIiNw0A__L44ug/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=109794657323597753486&rtpof=true&sd=true">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1n7HobJ6QTsNld5rn1uuIiNw0A__L44ug/edit?usp=sharing&ouid=109794657323597753486&rtpof=true&sd=true</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Sam reacted that there are merits to defining the query language separately from the protocol<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Tom said that the scope is wallet selection - not credential selection<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> It's being discussed at Kantara<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There were no new issues at <a href="https://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/2024-September/010447.html">
https://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/2024-September/010447.html</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>