<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Spec Call Notes 22-Aug-22<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mike Jones<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Nat Sakimura<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jeremie Miller<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kristina Yasuda<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tobias Looker<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dima Postnikov<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Karthik Sivasamy<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tobias Looker<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Naveen CM<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Edmund Jay<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Giuseppe De Marco<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">David Waite (DW)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issues<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open">
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1605: Back-Channel Logout Request: Specify how to handle timed out requests / offline RPs<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nat asked what the SecEvents specs are doing in error cases like this<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike said this could parallel the SecEvents push spec<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> He'll add a comment to the issue to that effect<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Pull Requests<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/">
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> PR #289: Described differences between Automatic and Explicit Registration<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> This is intended to address #1588 [Federation] Rename "Automatic Registration"<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Reviews have been requested<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Tobias asked whether signed requests are needed when using Automatic Registration<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> He wants to keep things simple, particular for public clients<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike asked Tobias to file an issue on that topic<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issues<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1600: OP Metadata Basic Information<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Changed component to Credential Issuance<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1602: Signed request - what is the audience?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We opened the issue<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> "aud" is a SHOULD in signed requests<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> More reviews and thoughts are requested<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">GAIN<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Dima said there was nothing new to report about on GAIN<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">At this point we switched to discussing OpenID4VC PRs and issues<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Pull Requests<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> PR #269: multiple credentials in the initiate issuance request (Issue #1569)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Kristina asked people whether people want a space-separated syntax<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Tobias wants credential type values to also be expressible as scopes<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> He thinks we should change the parameter to credential_types<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Kristina will update the PR<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issues<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1577: Cryptographic proof of possession nonce management<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Tobias suggested paralleling DPoP - including "jti", etc.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Tobias asked whether DPoP has a separate nonce endpoint or whether the first request just fails<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike said that in DPoP, the nonce comes back from the initial failed request<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Kristina agreed with keeping things parallel to DPoP<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We discussed problems with "jti" in distributed implementations but that it should probably be included<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Tobias to create a PR<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1585: Anatomy of a credential request<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Tobias stated that key attestation would be useful<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Kristina asked whether to include the key as a header parameter<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Tobias stated that that would make the key part of the proof of possession<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Using the "jwk" header parameter could be a simplification<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Tobias said that the attestation can't be in the proof of possession<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Jeremie supports renaming "proof" to "credential_binding"<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Kristina will write a PR<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Merging PRs<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Kristina informed us she'll be merging some PRs tomorrow<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> They all have three or more approvals and no objections and a week will have passed<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike agreed that that's reasonable criteria to proceed<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Next Call<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The next call will be on Thursday, August 25, 2022 at 7am Pacific Time<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>