<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Am 10.06.2022 um 11:56 schrieb David Chadwick <<a href="mailto:d.w.chadwick@verifiablecredentials.info" class="">d.w.chadwick@verifiablecredentials.info</a>>:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class="">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" class="">
<div class=""><p class=""><br class="">
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/06/2022 10:43, Torsten
Lodderstedt wrote:<br class="">
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:2FF99EC7-11D7-44B9-8022-A454AC7C395D@lodderstedt.net" class="">
read it and I think the public key id in the cert is a correlation
handle. <br class="">
</blockquote><p class="">Not if the key is transient and is different everytime (which is
what I said)</p><div class=""><br class=""></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>That would mean the wallet would need to obtain an authorisation credential from a central authority for every transaction. You think that will scale?<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><p class="">Kind regards</p><p class="">David<br class="">
</p>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>