<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hi Torsten</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I am bringing the Fraunhofer folks into
the conversation as they know the intricate details of TRAIN
better than I do<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/02/2022 16:18, Torsten
Lodderstedt wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:A66D7A2E-2B21-418E-827B-F8B1F86E7C8A@lodderstedt.net">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<p class="">Which developers are we referring to? If we
are talking about RP software developers, then calling
the open source TRAIN ATV API is much simpler than
interacting with published OIDC Federation metadata. Why
would such a developer who wishes to use TRAIN not use
the ATV API, given its an Apache license and the code is
freely available here:</p>
<p class=""><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://gitlab.grnet.gr/essif-lab/infrastructure/fraunhofer/train-source-code/-/tree/master/TRAIN-ATV-API"
moz-do-not-send="true">https://gitlab.grnet.gr/essif-lab/infrastructure/fraunhofer/train-source-code/-/tree/master/TRAIN-ATV-API</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
Is it limited to VCs? I’m asking since I want to understand
whether one could also manage trust in a federation of OIDC OPs
with the TRAIN API. </div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I am sure that the underlying EC Lightest Framework on which
TRAIN was built supports multiple types of trust lists. I don't
know if this flexibility has been carried through into TRAIN by
Fraunhofer, or if it only supports VC eco-systems. <br>
</p>
<p>The Fraunhofer folks will be able to answer this</p>
<p>Kind regards</p>
<p>David<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>