
<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Spec Call Notes 01-Jul-21<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><u class="">Attendees</u></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Joseph Heenan</div><div class="">Nat Sakimura</div><div class="">Mike Jones</div><div class="">Anthony Nadalin</div><div class="">Torsten Lodderstedt</div><div class="">Pawel Kowalik</div><div class="">Kiristina Yasuda</div><div class="">Tom Jones</div><div class="">Bjorn Hjelm</div><div class="">David Waite</div><div class="">John Bradley</div><div class="">Tim Cappalli</div><div class="">David Chadwick</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><u class="">Events</u></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Meeting with DIF group yesterday about presentation exchange, several alternatives discussed, very productive/cooperative but no conclusion yet, weekly calls going forward under DIF IPR regime.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Blockchain workshop: Nat said there was a session about DID / VCs / SSI in Financial use cases; paper is expected from JFSA on this topic, Nat will share link when it comes out.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><u class="">Issues</u></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1250/separating-claims-aggregation-and" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;" class="">https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1250/separating-claims-aggregation-and</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Torsten has several projects implementing that need a solution urgently.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Nat is planning to open a PR within a few business days. Torsten raised some limitations in the current draft.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1251/reference-jws-definition-of-base64url" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;" class="">https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1251/reference-jws-definition-of-base64url</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Clarification to be added in errata that base64url is always unpadded for OIDC uses.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1252/replace-pe-schema-with-type" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;" class="">https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1252/replace-pe-schema-with-type</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">DavidC said this is a placeholder just in case DIF group does not go ahead with the change.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1253/threat-analysis-for-binding-between-vc-and" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;" class="">https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1253/threat-analysis-for-binding-between-vc-and</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Nat is nervous after PR22 and thinks deeper analysis is needed. To be discussed on SIOP call.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1254/consider-using-json-web-proofs-once" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;" class="">https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1254/consider-using-json-web-proofs-once</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Kristina & MikeJ gave a summary. Goal is to have general purpose zero knowledge proofs that are an extensions of JWTs and allow for selective disclosure, so people don’t have to switch over to LD proofs, and it’s expected to eventually go to IETF.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1255/trust-in-self-issued-identifiers" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;" class="">https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1255/trust-in-self-issued-identifiers</a></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Tom says we need to be clear when we talk about ’trust’ in SIOP we need to be clear which particular trust(s) we are talking about. DavidC thinks it’s implicit that users trust software they are using. Ticket has been opened, discussion to continue.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><u class="">Pull Requests</u></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">No MRs ready to be discussed.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><u class="">Other</u></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Roland would like to dedicate the call in two weeks to the federation draft; this was agreed. Mike will send out invitations to interested parties.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>