<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Spec Call Notes 20-May-21<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Nat Sakimura<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tim Cappalli<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">John Bradley<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">George Fletcher<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Adam Lemmon<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tom Jones<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Torsten Lodderstedt<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kristina Yasuda<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Oliver Terbu<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Joseph Heenan<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Brian Campbell<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Dmitri Zagidulin<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mike Jones<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Bjorn Hjelm<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Privacy CG Report<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> There appears to be more engagement by all the browser makers<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Apple plans to participate in the workshop that Heather has organized for next week<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> An invitation for this should go out soon<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> On the other hand, there are people who believe that the browser is a critical component for all identity flows<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> This would require a new protocol - Not OpenID Connect, SAML, DIDs, etc.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> As Tim pointed out, this would be a new active party in the identity flows<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We should discuss this during the workshop<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Tim reports that there are advertisers, such as the Washington Post, participating in the conversation<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Brian reports that Brave is participating<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> They have implemented ephemeral buckets, where state is cleared quickly<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Brian said browsers are moving towards partitioned state<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nat said that if link decoration (query parameters) are deprecated, it could mess up Open Banking implementations<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Certification<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The certification suite has been updated to use the final FAPI 1.0 specs<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Brazil Open Banking - ~40 banks going live in July<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> They're using FAPI 1.0 and later also FAPI CIBA<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> There's directed funding to create a Brazil variant of the FAPI tests<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> There's an ongoing trickle of Connect certifications<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We raised the prices a few months ago to come closer to covering our costs<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We are also working on an open source fee waiver program<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Federation<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> A new draft has been published at <a href="https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-federation-1_0-15.html">
https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-federation-1_0-15.html</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Kristina reviewed the spec last week<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Torsten will review it<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Brian will try to review it, as will Tom<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike asked John to review it<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Following the reviews, it's our intent to start the Implementer's Draft adoption process<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Open Issues<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open">
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1237: vp vs. jwt_vp or vp_jwt?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We proposed to close this since it's being addressed in the new Verifiable Presentations draft<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1238: Requesting Verifiable Presentation<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We proposed to close this since it's being addressed in the new draft<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1229: Adoption of the "OpenID Connect for W3C Verifiable Credential Objects"<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nat created the VerifiablePresentation issue tracker feature<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nat filed a number of Claims Aggregation issues<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> These are mostly intended to improve the clarity of exposition<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1232: What is the scope of a signature?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Tom asked about what it means to sign a JWT when there's a claim that's also signed<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> George said that the signed data is intended to be sent and is integrity protected<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Generally, having a signed claim doesn't mean that it's been verified<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> But Mike said that "email_verified" means that "email" has been verified<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> John pointed out that the "iss" and "sub" are verified<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nat said that OpenID Connect for Identity Assurance defines some verification methods<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nat said that the veracity of some fields may be governed by Trust Frameworks<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> It's recommended that people review these related issues (which we ran out of time to discuss):<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1227: Core 5.5 - Claims parameter requirements<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1228: Discovery 3 - New metadata item for claims request<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Next Call<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The next regular Connect call will be on Monday, May 24 at 4pm Pacific Time<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>