<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Spec Call Notes 5-Apr-21<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Nat Sakimura<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mike Jones<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">David Waite<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Vittorio Bertocci<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Jeremie Miller<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Edmund Jay<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Kristina Yasuda<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Tim Cappalli<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Working Group Status Page Updates<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike updated the working group status page<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <a href="https://openid.net/wg/connect/status/">
https://openid.net/wg/connect/status/</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Newly adopted drafts were added<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Active working group members were updated<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">OpenID Connect Federation Spec<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Published draft -14, incorporating feedback from last year's three interop events<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The spec may be nearing final status<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> People are encouraged to review the spec now<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Particularly, look at changes in history entries from the last three releases<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We should discuss the spec status and next steps on the next European-friendly call<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> This will be Thursday, April 8th, 2021 at 7am Pacific Time<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Claims Aggregation Spec<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Edmund is reviewing the credential provider draft<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Apparently they're working on down-scoping<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Both drafts are trying to pass claims from Claims Providers to RPs<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nat wants to review the credential provider draft<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Note that the credential provider draft hasn't yet been contributed to the working group<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Open Issues<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open">
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open</a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1214: Certification: remove requirement for RP to support unsigned jwt<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> To be consistent, we should probably allow RPs to pass with only a warning if they don’t support unsigned ID Tokens<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1213: private_key_jwt, client_secret_jwt audience<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Filip summarized discussions from the 25-Mar-21 call in an issue comment<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We discussed that it should remain an error if the Token Endpoint value isn't supported<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> and that it should be a warning if the Issuer value isn't supported<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> #1217: Require JAR in SIOP to strongly ID the Relying Party<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> It's not clear what attack this proposal is intended to mitigate<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Deferred discussion until Tom is on the call<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">SIOP Special Call<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Kristina reported on discussions from the last SIOP Special Call<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> One topic discussed was how End-Users could select which SIOP to use<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Next Calls<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The next regular Connect call is on Thursday, April 8th, 2021 at 7am Pacific Time<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>