<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-2022-jp">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div style="">
<div style="">
<blockquote style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;">
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">SIOP Special Call Notes 02-Feb-21<br>
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white"><br>
</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">John Bradley</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Albert Solana</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Justin Richer</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Mike Varley</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Anthony Nadalin</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Torsten Lodderstedt</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Brian Campbell</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Tom Jones</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">David Moeller</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Nader Helmy</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Oliver Terbu</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">David Bantz</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Jeremie Miller</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Adam Lemmon</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Dion Bramley</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Kim Duffy</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Matt Randall</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Bjorn Hjelm</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Tobias Looker</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Edmund Jay</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Kristina Yasuda</span></div>
<div><span style="color:rgb(32,31,30); font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt"><br>
</span></div>
<div><span style="color:rgb(32,31,30); font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt">Regrets: Mike Jones</span></div>
</blockquote>
<div style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
</div>
<ul style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Introductions</span></li></ul>
<ul style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Agenda Bashing</span></li><ul>
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Kristina: Today's agenda is to introduce "Portable Identifiers work" and
<span style="background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255);display:inline !important">discuss scope and direction</span>: driving use-cases, adoption challenges, workstream name is a misnomer?, and relation to a MODERNA account porting spec</span></li></ul>
</ul>
<ul style="">
<li style="color: black; font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; vertical-align: middle;">
<span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Overview of the Portable Identifiers draft
</span><a href="https://mattrglobal.github.io/oidc-portable-identities/"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">https://mattrglobal.github.io/oidc-portable-identities/</span></a><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">
(WIP): </span></li><ul style="">
<li style="color: black; font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; vertical-align: middle;">
<span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Tobias: The problem addressed is how users can outlive the Provider and be able to transfer identity from one provider to another and what mechanisms are available to make
this possible. Related work is an account porting spec in OIDF MODERNA WG that defines mechanisms to hand-over from one provider to another. </span></li><li style="color: black; font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; vertical-align: middle;">
<span style="font-family: calibri; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(32, 31, 30); background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);"><b>Mechanism we are exploring is using cryptography to establish proof of control over the subject identifier
</b>to allow transferring ownership and consent of the user. DIDs establish a way to achieve this.</span></li><li style="color: black; font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; vertical-align: middle;">
<span style="font-family: calibri; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(32, 31, 30); background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);">SIOP, Chapter 7 in OIDC, allows for portability for co-located model, this work tries to expand that to other deployment models</span></li></ul>
</ul>
<ul style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Use-cases motivating the work</span></li><ul>
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Torsten:<b> SSI is about portability, but no one emphasizes it.</b> Portable identifiers would
provide a way for server cloud hosted wallets to assert DIDs, which is impossible with the scope of SIOP V2 draft which revises OIDC chapter 7 and is optimized for a deployment model where OP and RP are co-located.
</span></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Torsten: Example of
<b>real life use-case would be British Columbia's prototype</b> where a server-hosted OP uses DIDs and VCs. Would als o like to enable banks in Yes.com ecosystem to assert
</span></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Question from Kim regarding details of Section 6 "Subject Identifiers"</span></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Tobias: in OIDC, identifiers are domain bound to the IdP's namespace, but there could be other
types of identifiers: jwk thumbprint is one kind of identifier used in original SIOP section of OIDC and DIDs are another kind.</span></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Kristina:
<b>rough consensus in the WG since the beginning of SIOP revision has been to introduce a layer of indirection to `sub` to allow it to be a URI.</b> With this, DIDs can be used as subject identifiers.</span></li><li style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;vertical-align:middle;color:black"><span style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">Clarification from Tony - "wallets" are not limited to mobile wallets, any server
hosted OPs would be able to assert DIDs.</span></li><li style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;vertical-align:middle;color:black"><span style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">Tobias: "wallet" is an overarching term, used in particular deployment models,
but the function that it serves is OPs<br>
</span></li></ul>
</ul>
<ul style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="color:rgb(32,31,30); font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt">Why another attempt at portable identifiers will have a different outcome (than i-names), whether for adoption
by people, adoption by RPs, or adoption by OPs?</span><br>
</li><ul>
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Tobias: Agrees with Mike's sentiment that normal people don’t care about portable login identifiers.<span style="">
</span>This is more about identity bound to the provider - trust relationship - does not want to offer
</span></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">John: with former i-names, problem was with a business model. Given that larger providers
give identifiers for free, paid IdP did not fly. </span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">No </span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">one
is against having portability, but no body was willing to pay extra for it.</span></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Torsten</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">:</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">
No one is willing to pay </span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">for identity
</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">-
</span><b><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">the discussion on
</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">business
</span></b><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white"><b>model is related to the entire SSI-based model
</b>and should be separate from a technical discussion here.</span></li><li style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;vertical-align:middle;color:black"><span lang="ja" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">John</span><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">:</span><span lang="ja" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white"><span> </span>all
comes down to the key management and asserting identifiers, other things come along to be used</span><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">.</span><span lang="ja" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white"> Currently, </span><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">IdPs
use keys bound to their DNS which means using</span><span lang="ja" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white"> single key for all identifiers.<span> </span><b>There is a good reason to abstract that into being
able to use individual keys for individual accounts, separate from a business model discussion.</b></span></li><li style="margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;vertical-align:middle;color:black"><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">Kim: we are f</span><span lang="ja" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">ocusing
on a wrong use case</span><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">. In<span> </span></span><span lang="ja" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">educational
occupational credentials</span><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">,
<b>users </b></span><b><span lang="ja" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">care about things remaining usable<span> </span></span><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">over</span></b><span lang="ja" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white"><b><span> </span>life
time, </b>and they don't care if it's phrased portability</span><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px;font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri;color:rgb(32, 31, 30);background:white">. We just need to expand out to the use cases that benefit from portability.<br>
</span></li></ul>
</ul>
<ul style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white"><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px; font-size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:rgb(32,31,30); background:white">Is<span> </span></span><span lang="ja" style="margin:0px; font-size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:rgb(32,31,30); background:white">"Portable
Identifiers"<span> </span></span><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px; font-size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:rgb(32,31,30); background:white">is<span> </span></span><span lang="ja" style="margin:0px; font-size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:rgb(32,31,30); background:white">a
misnomer</span><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px; font-size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:rgb(32,31,30); background:white">?</span><br>
</span></li><ul>
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">John: we are n</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">ot
talking about porting identifier themselves</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">, rather that<b> the </b></span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white"><b>cryptographic
keys used to prove control over identifiers are portable</b> and can potentially be used to migrate from one identifier to another.</span></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">John: the naming can be "Portability of cryptographyc proofs to assert control over
identifiers" spec</span></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Kim: this is not about portable identifiers but portable credentials associated with
an identifier</span></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Tony:
</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">How do you define portable credentials</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">?</span></li><li lang="en-US" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black">
<span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">John: identifier is part of a credential, every credential is essentially portable; need to define the language</span></li><li lang="en-US" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black">
<span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white"><span lang="ja" style="margin:0px; font-size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:rgb(32,31,30); background:white">General consensus is yes. Alternative naming suggestions in a
chat: Portability between Identifiers rather than Portable Identifiers</span><span lang="en-US" style="margin:0px; font-size:11pt; font-family:Calibri; color:rgb(32,31,30); background:white">; Inter-Identifier Portability (IIP)</span></span></li></ul>
</ul>
<ul style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<li lang="en-US" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black">
<span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; color:rgb(32,31,30); background-image:initial; background-position:initial; background-size:initial; background-repeat:initial; background-attachment:initial; background-origin:initial; background-clip:initial">W</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; color:rgb(32,31,30); background-image:initial; background-position:initial; background-size:initial; background-repeat:initial; background-attachment:initial; background-origin:initial; background-clip:initial">hat
changes would be required from </span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; color:rgb(32,31,30); background-image:initial; background-position:initial; background-size:initial; background-repeat:initial; background-attachment:initial; background-origin:initial; background-clip:initial">OpenID
Connect RPs</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; color:rgb(32,31,30); background-image:initial; background-position:initial; background-size:initial; background-repeat:initial; background-attachment:initial; background-origin:initial; background-clip:initial">
to support 'portable identifiers'</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11pt; color:rgb(32,31,30); background-image:initial; background-position:initial; background-size:initial; background-repeat:initial; background-attachment:initial; background-origin:initial; background-clip:initial">?</span><br>
</li><ul>
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">As e</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">xplored
in the </span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Portable Identifiers
</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">draft</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">,</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">
RP</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">s</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white"> would
</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">have to
</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">expand client metadata element</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">s indicating support
for supported subject identifier types and did methods. <b>ID token would be fundamentally signed by the provider who is performing the authentication, but there would be a separate claim in the ID token that proves user's control over the subject identifier.</b> </span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Worst
scenario - RP would assume identifier is tied to the provider (instead of a user)</span></li></ul>
</ul>
<ul style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">W</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">hat
changes would be required from </span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">OpenID Connect
</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">O</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Ps</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">
to support 'portable identifiers'</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">?</span></li><ul>
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">OP</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">
would need to </span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">support cryptographically verifiable subject identifiers - including DIDs. And advertising support for those features through OIDC discovery
mechanisms</span></li></ul>
</ul>
<ul style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<li lang="en-US" style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black">
<span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">No comments regarding the usage of VCs/VPs in OIDC</span></li></ul>
<ul style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;">
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Can this be a profile to MODERNA Account Porting spec?
</span></li><ul>
<li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">General consensus is no,
<b>this should be a separate work due to a differences in </b></span><b><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">concept
</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">and approach.</span></b></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">John: In MODERNA complete cryptographic proof is not used though it was considered
because you have an Old OP to provide look up services. We should not be constrained by the choices MODERNA made.</span></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Bjorn: MODERNA porting is based on migration mechanism from OpenID 2.0 to OpenID
Connect. a</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">ccount porting
</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">spec is
</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">written
</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">in a
</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">very flexible
</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">way</span></li><li style="margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0; vertical-align:middle; color:black"><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">Torsten: co-author of account porting spec - the spec assumes that</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">
old OP is still operational </span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">even after</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white"> account porting
has happened</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">. Another big difference with Portable identifiers spec is the fact that in account porting spec, i</span><span lang="ja" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">dentifier
is always scoped in the name space of IdP - not the case with DIDs</span><span lang="en-US" style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:11.0pt; color:#201F1E; background:white">.</span></li></ul>
</ul>
</div>
<br>
</div>
<div style=""><span style="font-family: calibri; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(32, 31, 30); background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);">Minutes can also be found in Connect WG Bitbucket Wiki: </span><a href="https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/wiki/SIOP%20Special%20Call%20Notes%2002-Feb-21" id="LPlnk375037" style=""><span style="font-family: calibri; font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(32, 31, 30); background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);">https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/wiki/SIOP%20Special%20Call%20Notes%2002-Feb-21</span></a></div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>