<div dir="ltr">One correction re: ballot resolution meeting. It will be just after the comment and voting period. <div><br></div><div style>In ISO, comment always is associated with a vote. Typically, technical comment is associated with disapproval vote. </div>
<div style>(Comment with approval vote can be ignored, but that came with a disapproval vote must be addressed.) </div><div style>In the ballot resolution meeting, we discuss the comment and the WG may choose to accept. </div>
<div style>At least we have to decide on whether we Accept/Accept in principle/Reject/Note. </div><div style>At the end of the meeting we again ask whether the member states reverses the vote, and if it goes well, everybody who casted disapproval vote would reverse their vote to reach consensus. If it were at the Draft International Standard (DIS) level, if there were no disapproval vote, we can skip Final Draft International Standard and publish directly as an International Standard. We do not have to do another review period nor vote, so it saves a lot of time. </div>
<div style><br></div><div style>Best, </div><div style><br></div><div style>Nat</div><div style><br></div><div style><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/6/6 Mike Jones <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com" target="_blank">Michael.Jones@microsoft.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Spec call notes 6-Jun-13<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Nat Sakimura<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mike Jones<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Brian Campbell<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Justin Richer<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">William Kim (Mitre)<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Edmund Jay<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thomas Hardjono<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">George Fletcher<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">John Bradley<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Agenda:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Open Issues<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Implementer's Drafts Announcement and Schedule<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Open Issues:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> There are no open issues filed for the Implementer's Drafts<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nat raised a few minor issues:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Definition of Authentication<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We will go with "Process of verifying that an entity is the owner of an identity"<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Date of publication of ISO 29115<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> March 2013<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Definition of Identity<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We will go with "Set of attributes related to an entity"<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> (from ISO and ITU-T)<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> On the "formatted" address claim:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We will delete "It is the primary member for printing..."<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Nat asked why JWT Bearer doesn't define an "Authorization" header<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Brian responded that it's not necessary, because it's just used at the Token Endpoint<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike agreed that we don't want to re-open the assertions specs<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Implementer's Drafts Announcement and Schedule:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We will start the 24 hour clock after Mike applies the set of changes above<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We will not wait for spelling/grammar check changes<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Comments will come in through the normal working group process<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> For reference, Nat described the ISO ballot resolution process for handling changes during the review period<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Openid-specs-ab mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openid-specs-ab@lists.openid.net">Openid-specs-ab@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab" target="_blank">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Nat Sakimura (=nat)<div>Chairman, OpenID Foundation<br><a href="http://nat.sakimura.org/" target="_blank">http://nat.sakimura.org/</a><br>@_nat_en</div>
</div>