<div dir="ltr">Thanks Mike. <div><br></div><div>I calculated the projected dates. (2ID stands for 2nd Implementor's Draft) <br></div><div><br></div><div><div>December 1, 2013<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Final Approved</div>
<div>November 24, 2013<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Final Vote Starts</div><div>November 10, 2013<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Final Vote Notice Starts</div><div>September 25, 2013<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> </span>Final Review Period Starts</div>
<div>September 18, 2013<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> </span>WG Consensus and notice to OIDF Secretary</div><div><span class="" style="white-space:pre"> </span></div><div>July 28, 2013<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> 2</span>ID Approved</div>
<div>July 21, 2013<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> 2</span>ID Vote Starts</div><div>July 7, 2013<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> 2</span>ID Vote Notice Starts</div><div>June 6, 2013<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> 2</span>ID Review Period Starts</div>
<div>May 30, 2013<span class="" style="white-space:pre"> </span>WG Consensus and notice to OIDF Secretary</div></div><div><br></div><div style>Looking at these dates, I am not optimistic as to the progress of JWx. </div><div style>
We should also prepare the contingency. If, at the end, we did not need to use the contingency, that's good. </div><div style>But not being ready is a bit silly. </div><div style><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/5/29 Mike Jones <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Michael.Jones@microsoft.com" target="_blank">Michael.Jones@microsoft.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Spec call notes 28-May-13<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Nat Sakimura<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Mike Jones<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Edmund Jay<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">John Bradley<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Christian Weiss (observing)<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Agenda:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> JOSE Status<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Status of Specs We're Dependent Upon<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Open Issues<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Implementer's Drafts<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">JOSE Status:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike published the -11 drafts today<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We will base the Implementer's Drafts on these<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Use Cases will be first to go to WGLC<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Sean wants to use this to clear the way in the IESG for the main specs<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> The rechartering was finally completed<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Sean Turner published revised JOSE milestones<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> See "[jose] Milestones changed for jose WG" on May 22nd<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> It calls for WGLC on the main docs in October 2013<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We should definitely try to get this to happen sooner than that<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We need to clearly communicate the need for these specs be standards soon<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Status of Specs We're Dependent Upon:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> WebFinger:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Making progress, new draft published<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> People should review the new draft<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Acct URI:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Making progress, new draft published<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> OAuth Dependencies:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> JWT, JWT Assertions, Assertions, Dynamic Registration<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> People should continue actively participating in all these<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Justin published an updated Dynamic Registration spec<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Connect Registration is already synced with it<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> JWT and JWT Assertions are probably on the JOSE schedule<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Assertions (and SAML Assertions) may go to the IESG again soon<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> There's currently a WebFinger/Acct discussion people should participate in<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> For using accounts like mbj@microsoft.com@<a href="http://google.com" target="_blank">google.com</a><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Open Issues:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Resolutions were determined for two new open issues, #836 & #837<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We will call out the <a href="mailto:acct%3Ambj%2520microsoft.com@google.com" target="_blank">acct:mbj%20microsoft.com@google.com</a> case in Discovery<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> This will be a heads-up to developers - not a normative change<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> We need to determine a resolution for the "[Openid-specs-ab] jku and x5u" thread<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> John will make a proposal to the list<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Implementer's Drafts:<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Mike should be able to incorporate text for all the open issues tomorrow<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> At that point, he will send an "are we ready?" message<u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> Based on responses, we will make a go/no-go decision on Thursday's call<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Openid-specs-ab mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Openid-specs-ab@lists.openid.net">Openid-specs-ab@lists.openid.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab" target="_blank">http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>Nat Sakimura (=nat)<div>Chairman, OpenID Foundation<br><a href="http://nat.sakimura.org/" target="_blank">http://nat.sakimura.org/</a><br>@_nat_en</div>
</div>