<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Agenda addition for today's call</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE="Lucida Grande"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>Unfortuantely I’ll be on a plane today. <BR>
<BR>
I’m in support of a merge of the two bindings.<BR>
<BR>
-cmort<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 6/20/11 10:51 AM, "Nat Sakimura" <<a href="sakimura@gmail.com">sakimura@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<BR>
<BR>
</SPAN></FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE="Lucida Grande"><SPAN STYLE='font-size:11pt'>I would like to propose the following for today's spec call. <BR>
<BR>
1. Status check of each sub-specs. <BR>
<BR>
Report from each sub-spec editors. <BR>
<BR>
- Core<BR>
- UserInfo<BR>
- Session<BR>
- JWE<BR>
- Bindings<BR>
<BR>
2. Whether or not to add non-normative text for Bindings<BR>
<BR>
Currently, we have very little non-normative text in the Bindings and the reader has to go refer the Core and OAuth spec very often. <BR>
Perhaps including some non-normative text instead of just referencing would improve the readability. <BR>
<BR>
3. Whether or not to merge Code Binding and Artifact Binding<BR>
<BR>
In fact, the are only a few lines of difference now. Perhaps can we merge them together? <BR>
<BR>
4. Separating out the session spec? <BR>
<BR>
Right now, session spec is included in the core. A while ago, there seems to have been some talk around separating it out again. <BR>
I would like to close on this. <BR>
</SPAN></FONT></BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>