[Openid-specs-ab] Possible typo in the discovery spec

Justin Richer jricher at mit.edu
Fri Sep 29 13:00:05 UTC 2017


Ordering does not matter, but consistency is probably good.

  -- Justin


On 9/29/2017 7:37 AM, Sergey Beryozkin via Openid-specs-ab wrote:
> Hi
>
> http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-discovery-1_0.html#ProviderMetadata 
>
>
> says that "Dynamic OpenID Providers MUST support the code, id_token, 
> and the *token id_token* Response Type values."
>
> While the Core spec refers to "id_token token".
>
> Does the ordering of 'token' and 'id_token' matter for this 
> response_type value ?
>
> Thanks, Sergey
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab



More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list