[Openid-specs-ab] Spec call notes 17-Oct-13
roland.hedberg at adm.umu.se
Fri Oct 18 07:56:06 UTC 2013
17 okt 2013 kl. 20:48 skrev Brian Campbell <bcampbell at pingidentity.com>:
> I'm sympathetic both to the desire to get something shipped as well as wanting to get the feature set just right. I'm gonna try to stay out of that particular fight.
> I will say that the POST response type approach I sent earlier can be done as a small extension. And could also be folded into the core spec suite pretty easily too.
Speaking as an implementor implementing POST binding support is easy.
In fact coming from SAML2 I had the same reaction as Mikes implementors; why not a POST binding.
So, I don't regard this as a major change especially if fragment encoding stays MTI of which I think everyone agrees.
"Education is the path from cocky ignorance to miserable uncertainty.” - Mark Twain
More information about the Openid-specs-ab