[Openid-specs-ab] Couple questions on the UserInfo Request

Nat Sakimura sakimura at gmail.com
Tue Mar 5 19:26:45 UTC 2013


At around the time, we switched from SCIM schema to the flat schema
due to developer requests at the time. However, we wanted to provide
the ability to specify other scheme name such as scim to get the data
in that format if the server supports.

Sent from iPad

2013/03/06 4:10、Vladimir Dzhuvinov / NimbusDS <vladimir at nimbusds.com> のメッセージ:

> I was also wondering about that. It seems to be an artefact from old
> drafts 05 and 07, as the doc history suggests:
>
> http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-messages-1_0.html#rfc.section.C
>
> Vladimir
>
> --
> Vladimir Dzhuvinov : www.NimbusDS.com : vladimir at nimbusds.com
>
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [Openid-specs-ab] Couple questions on the UserInfo Request
> From: Brian Campbell <bcampbell at pingidentity.com>
> Date: Tue, March 05, 2013 6:30 pm
> To: "<openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>"
> <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
>
> In §2.3.1. UserInfo Request at
> http://openid.bitbucket.org/openid-connect-messages-1_0.html#UserInfoRequest
> , if the only defined schema value is openid, why make it required
> rather than just defaulting to the only current possible value?
>
> And what is the id parameter for? It just kind of sticks out as odd
> there. I imagine there's some reason it's there but the associated text
> is kind of cryptic and doesn't explain much.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list