[Openid-specs-ab] Spec call notes 7-Jun-12

Breno de Medeiros breno at google.com
Fri Jun 15 16:45:00 UTC 2012


+1
On Jun 15, 2012 9:30 AM, "Brian Campbell" <bcampbell at pingidentity.com>
wrote:

> I also prefer "preferred_username"
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Mike Jones
> <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Justin Richer [mailto:jricher at mitre.org]
> > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 9:24 AM
> > To: Mike Jones
> > Cc: John Bradley; Vladimir Dzhuvinov / NimbusDS;
> openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> > Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Spec call notes 7-Jun-12
> >
> > In case my previous response gets lost in the list traffic, I would
> rather see "preferred_username" instead of "username_hint" to match the
> PoCo naming of this same field.
> >
> >  -- Justin
> >
> > On 06/15/2012 12:09 PM, Mike Jones wrote:
> >> +1 that the name "username_hint" would cut down on errors by people who
> don't closely read the spec.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net
> >> [mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of John
> >> Bradley
> >> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 5:42 AM
> >> To: Vladimir Dzhuvinov / NimbusDS
> >> Cc: openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> >> Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Spec call notes 7-Jun-12
> >>
> >> I would be happier with username_hint as it will cut down on errors by
> people who don't read the spec.
> >>
> >> I have had to deal with enough issues in openID 2 where RP don't read
> the spec do something stupid and the media blames openID.   I know we can't
> stop that completely,  but I know if it is called username in a year or so
> there will be a security incident,  that is not the specs fault but we will
> be blamed anyway.
> >>
> >> If there is a good reason for calling it username I won't try to block
> it.  At the moment the logic is mostly that is what facebook calls the
> element that they put the users profile page subsegment into.
> >>
> >> John B.
> >>
> >> On 2012-06-14, at 11:35 AM, Vladimir Dzhuvinov / NimbusDS wrote:
> >>
> >>> username_hint seems to reflect the claim purpose better!
> >>>
> >>> + 1
> >>>
> >>> Vladimir
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> >>> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> >>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> >> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> >> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> >> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> >> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> > Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20120615/800ba187/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list