[Openid-specs-ab] Spec call notes 31-May-12

Mike Jones Michael.Jones at microsoft.com
Mon Jun 4 22:48:00 UTC 2012


Our thinking was that anyone who made comments that resulted in specific wording additions/changes to any draft should be acknowledged in that draft.

                                                                -- Mike

From: Brian Campbell [mailto:bcampbell at pingidentity.com]
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 3:45 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Spec call notes 31-May-12

OAuth:
                Mike is having weekly calls with the chairs to try to finish Bearer and Core
                It would be useful for people to read Hannes' comments on the Assertions spec


Last week and today I tried to respond in some way to all of Hannes' comments in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09143.html and http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09106.html but additional eyes on the draft and any thoughts are definitely welcome.

Acknowledgements:
                Nat will mine the AB list for the missing acknowledgement lists
                After that, we'll send a note to the AB list asking for corrections

Um, does this count as something to be acknowledged? ;)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20120604/4795bf89/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list