[Openid-specs-ab] Implementor's draft process (issue #398)

John Ehrig jehrig at inventures.com
Wed Dec 14 16:47:17 UTC 2011


Hi Mike,

 

A.       I sent the legal contacts to Nat quite a while ago.  I can
resend if need be.

B.      Adding Darin to the loop.  He has that info and can set you up.
Darin, please reply on this item.

 

From: Mike Jones [mailto:Michael.Jones at microsoft.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 9:35 PM
To: John Ehrig
Cc: Don Thibeau; Nat Sakimura; openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
Subject: RE: [Openid-specs-ab] Implementor's draft process (issue #398)

 

John Ehrig - a few questions pertinent to notifying people of the
Implementer's Drafts:

 

A.  Have we compiled the list of legal contacts for the AB WG
contributors (if any)?  If not, can you please do so today?

 

B.  Can you point me to the tool I'll use as Secretary to send mail to
the entire membership?  And if I need any special credentials to use
them, can you please supply them?

 

                                                            Thanks,

                                                            -- Mike

 

From: openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net
[mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of Nat
Sakimura
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:50 PM
To: openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
Subject: [Openid-specs-ab] Implementor's draft process (issue #398)

 

Here you go: 

 

 

1.	In the regular WG meeting, Editors should discuss whether there
is a consensus per section 5.3 and 3.3.
2.	If yes, then Editors send the notice of start of the review
period per section 5.2 to the contributors. It will be 45 days. The
notice MUST have the start and end dates of the period.
3.	On the same day, the secretary should send the notice of the
OIDF membership review. The OIDF membership review period is 45 days.
The notice should be sent multiple times, including to the legal
contacts. It also MUST state the start and end dates.
4.	The contributors review it. The board should review within 30
days to evaluate if it poses risk to OIDF, and if by super majority vote
the OIDF board decides that the risk is too big, it should notify the WG
so that the revision can be made.
5.	Provided that there was no change required, at the latest on the
31st day of the review period, notice of voting should be sent and put
prominently on the OIDF web site.
6.	Simple Majority vote with quorum of 20% of the membership.
7.	7 days voting period. Proxy is allowed in which case the person
who gives proxy must indicate his OpenID identifier and designate the
proxy's OpenID Identifier.

-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)

Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20111214/3bc99e9f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list