[Openid-specs-ab] Implementor's draft process (issue #398)

Nat Sakimura sakimura at gmail.com
Wed Dec 14 04:49:44 UTC 2011


Here you go:



   1. In the regular WG meeting, Editors should discuss whether there is a
   consensus per section 5.3 and 3.3.
   2. If yes, then Editors send the notice of start of the review period
   per section 5.2 to the contributors. It will be 45 days. The notice MUST
   have the start and end dates of the period.
   3. On the same day, the secretary should send the notice of the OIDF
   membership review. The OIDF membership review period is 45 days. The notice
   should be sent multiple times, including to the legal contacts. It also
   MUST state the start and end dates.
   4. The contributors review it. The board should review within 30 days to
   evaluate if it poses risk to OIDF, and if by super majority vote the OIDF
   board decides that the risk is too big, it should notify the WG so that the
   revision can be made.
   5. Provided that there was no change required, at the latest on the 31st
   day of the review period, notice of voting should be sent and put
   prominently on the OIDF web site.
   6. Simple Majority vote with quorum of 20% of the membership.
   7. 7 days voting period. Proxy is allowed in which case the person who
   gives proxy must indicate his OpenID identifier and designate the proxy's
   OpenID Identifier.

-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20111214/6dcd6bf9/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list