[Openid-specs-ab] Developer Feedback

Anthony Nadalin tonynad at microsoft.com
Tue Jul 12 17:50:00 UTC 2011


-1

The framework document does outline the basic structures, the other documents don't so calling the whole set of documents a framework is wrong

-----Original Message-----
From: openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net [mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of Johnny Bufu
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2011 10:37 AM
To: Pam Dingle
Cc: openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Developer Feedback


On 11-07-12 10:10 AM, Pam Dingle wrote:
> I like the idea of *not* using the work 'framework' for any specific 
> document.  That way the whole suite could be called a framework or any 
> other analogous term without confusion.

+1

 From the current Framework's abstract it seems there should be a better word to describe it along the lines of optional/extension/advanced (or just make it Core).

Johnny
_______________________________________________
Openid-specs-ab mailing list
Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab






More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list