[Openid-specs-ab] Little more feedback

Breno de Medeiros breno at google.com
Tue Jul 12 05:27:19 UTC 2011


On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 18:20, Johnny Bufu <jbufu at janrain.com> wrote:
>
> On 11-07-11 03:44 PM, Pam Dingle wrote:
>>
>> UserInfo:
>>
>>    * section 2.2 - the description of "must return a subset" and "may
>>      return additional attributes" seems to conflict to me.
>
> It looked like a conflict to me at the first read too; however, I noticed
> that the wording after the MUST is that the response "*contains* a set of
> claims that are a subset".
>
> So a subset of the defined claims MUST be included with each response, extra
> claims MAY be added as well.
>
> The MUST is however superfluous given that the empty set is a subset of any
> other set. Intent was probably that the response MUST contain a non-empty
> subset of the defined claims.

I think we should make the MUST specific: The set of claims MUST
include the 'id', for instance.

>
> Johnny
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>



-- 
--Breno


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list