[Openid-specs-ab] Harmonization to OAuth2.0

Nat Sakimura sakimura at gmail.com
Fri May 7 11:22:42 UTC 2010


Also, perhaps change "rpfurl" to "status"?

Is it over-doing it?

=nat

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Nat Sakimura <sakimura at gmail.com> wrote:

> As you know, draft04 of AB is almost OAuth2.0 compatible in terms of the
> variable names.
> Delta are
>
> * return_to (OAuth2.0 uses redirect_uri)
> * artifact (OAuth2.0 uses code)
>
> For artifact, we can go on to use "code" instead of "artifact".
> What about "return_to"?
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
> http://www.sakimura.org/en/
> http://twitter.com/_nat_en
>



-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
http://www.sakimura.org/en/
http://twitter.com/_nat_en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20100507/3b12c85e/attachment.htm>


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list