[Openid-specs-ab] Key-binding and dpop scope

[Filip Skokan]

I haven't seen a scope name I like yet, so +1 to finding a better one :)

S pozdravem,
*Filip Skokan*


On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 at 18:30, Dick Hardt <dick.hardt at hello.coop> wrote:

> +1 to which suggestion Filip? :)
> ᐧ
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2025 at 4:20 PM Filip Skokan <panva.ip at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> S pozdravem,
>> *Filip Skokan*
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 at 17:15, george--- via Openid-specs-ab <
>> openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Would it make sense to change the scope name identified in the
>>> key-binding spec from something specific like ‘dpop’ to something more
>>> generic? e.g. ‘id_token_kb’ ? Or maybe just make clearer that the RP is
>>> looking for key bound tokens? e.g. ‘dpop_kb’? I just worry that ‘dpop’ by
>>> itself does not communicate the intended behavior.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> George Fletcher
>>> Identity Standards Architect
>>> Practical Identity LLC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
>>> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
>>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20250829/b69876ff/attachment-0001.htm>