[Openid-specs-ab] Key-binding and dpop scope

[Frederik Krogsdal Jacobsen]

I support this. Another consideration is that dpop is short enough that
somebody out there may already use it for something else.

Cheers,
Frederik

On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 at 17:20, Filip Skokan via Openid-specs-ab <
openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> wrote:

> +1
>
> S pozdravem,
> *Filip Skokan*
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Aug 2025 at 17:15, george--- via Openid-specs-ab <
> openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would it make sense to change the scope name identified in the
>> key-binding spec from something specific like ‘dpop’ to something more
>> generic? e.g. ‘id_token_kb’ ? Or maybe just make clearer that the RP is
>> looking for key bound tokens? e.g. ‘dpop_kb’? I just worry that ‘dpop’ by
>> itself does not communicate the intended behavior.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> George Fletcher
>> Identity Standards Architect
>> Practical Identity LLC
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
>> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
>> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20250829/fd69d358/attachment.htm>