[Openid-specs-ab] Fwd: Contributing OpenID Connect Relying Party Metadata Choices 1.0 spec to the working group

[Giuseppe De Marco]

I support adoption.

Il giorno mar 22 ott 2024 alle ore 01:27 Nat Sakimura via Openid-specs-ab <
openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> ha scritto:

> Dear AB/Connect WG:
>
> This email will start a one-week call for the adoption of the OpenID
> Connect Relying Party Metadata Choices 1.0 spec.
> It was contributed on the last week of September and in discussion since
> that, it was agreed that we need to clarify that multiple choices are not
> to be used in DCR responses
> On the call last week, we discussed that it would be fine to do this after
> adoption.
>
> As a reminder, adoption does not mean a document is finished, only that it
> is an acceptable starting point.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Nat Sakimura
> Co-Chair, AB/Connect WG
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Michael Jones via Openid-specs-ab <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 at 11:35
> Subject: [Openid-specs-ab] Contributing OpenID Connect Relying Party
> Metadata Choices 1.0 spec to the working group
> To: openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
> Cc: Michael Jones <michael_b_jones at hotmail.com>
>
>
> The authors of the attached specification hereby contribute it to the
> OpenID Connect working group.  It was created to address issues
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/2158/metadata-parameter-value-arrays-for-rp
> and https://github.com/openid/federation/issues/12.
>
>
>
>                                                                 -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Jones
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 3, 2024 10:09 PM
> *To:* openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> *Subject:* FW: OpenID Connect Relying Party Metadata Choices 1.0 spec
>
>
>
> On Monday’s working group call, we discussed that I should go through the
> list of registered OAuth Client Metadata values
> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/oauth-parameters/oauth-parameters.xhtml#client-metadata>
> and see if there were any more that should be added to the list in this
> specification.  My conclusion was that there were not.  I’ll therefore plan
> to contribute it to the working group as-is so we can start addressing the
> issues filed unless I hear feedback soon requesting changes first.
>
>
>
>                                                                 Thanks all,
>
>                                                                 -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Jones
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 29, 2024 7:53 PM
> *To:* openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> *Subject:* OpenID Connect Relying Party Metadata Choices 1.0 spec
>
>
>
> The attached spec (with source and HTML output) defines client metadata
> parameters corresponding to all the single-valued OpenID Connect Dynamic
> Client Registration metadata parameters, letting RPs declare the sets of
> values for these parameters that they support.  This is intended to address
> both
> https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/2158/metadata-parameter-value-arrays-for-rp
> and https://github.com/openid/federation/issues/12.
>
>
>
> Reviews welcomed!
>
>
>
>                                                                 -- Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20241022/f943fb38/attachment.htm>