[Openid-specs-ab] OpenID Federation Wallet Architectures Draft
Brian Campbell
bcampbell at pingidentity.com
Wed Aug 14 16:36:00 UTC 2024
I'm responding only to a very small subset of the original content where I
have specific knowledge to do so. A lot of other content has been removed
in the interest of readability.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 3:58 PM Giuseppe De Marco via Openid-specs-ab <
openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>
> This inconsistency is also evident in SD-JWT-based Verifiable Credentials
> (SD-JWT VC) (
> https://drafts.oauth.net/oauth-sd-jwt-vc/draft-ietf-oauth-sd-jwt-vc.html#section-3.5),
> which introduces DIDs (to my great pleasure)
>
And to the dismay of myself and a non-trivial number of others. There is a
movement underway to remove the DID reference and the inadequate related
text.
> but does not mention OpenID Federation in any way.
>
That is correct. It does not. But it does not preclude it either. There is
an explicit and intentional "extension" point to allow for such.
--
_CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use,
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your
computer. Thank you._
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20240814/783884b5/attachment.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-ab
mailing list