[Openid-specs-ab] Spec Call Notes 12-Aug-24
Michael Jones
michael_b_jones at hotmail.com
Tue Aug 13 01:35:30 UTC 2024
Spec Call Notes 12-Aug-24
Mike Jones
Brian Campbell
Nat Sakimura
Alan Wang
Dima Postnikov
Victor Yu
Bjorn Hjelm
Tom Jones
Edmund Jay
Shared Signals Implementer's Drafts Vote
Participate at https://openid.net/foundation/members/polls/334
EU Implementing Acts
There's a public comment period on the EU Implementing Acts
Nat said that there are 5 documents
https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives_en?text=European%20Digital%20Identity%20Wallets
The feedback period is August 12 to September 9, 2024
Nat said that the implementing acts specify ISO 18013-5 as the protocol
We discussed that only final specifications can be referenced from implementing acts
So the OpenID4VC specs, SD-JWT, etc. are not referenced
Nat said that many things are still unspecified
Such as rules for attributed attestations
Nat remarked that there's a protocol for credential deletion
[Openid-specs-ab] Call for Working Group Adoption of OpenID Federation Extended Subordinate Listing 1.0
This spec defines how to do paginated listings of subordinates
All respondents so far support adoption
[Openid-specs-ab] Call for Working Group Adoption of OpenID Federation Wallet Architectures 1.0
There's been some discussion of the contribution and whether it should be adopted as-is
Joseph thought that some metadata values currently defined there should be in other specs
In the long term, everyone responding to him agreed with him
There was disagreement on whether adoption should wait for these values to be first defined elsewhere
These were written down now to enable interoperable implementations of wallet ecosystems using Federation to be developed
Mike asked Nat to be ready to make the adoption decision as chair next week
Since John and Mike are authors
Giuseppe sent a detailed message describing each of the defined metadata parameters and their purpose
Bjorn asked whether an editor's note could be added saying that the metadata parameters could eventually be defined elsewhere and then referenced there once that's been done
Nat agreed that we could make non-normative updates such as adding this note
Bjorn said that he isn't dismissing Joseph's concerns
Bjorn said that he also wants to be sensitive to people wanting to make progress and implement now
Metadata parameter value arrays for RP metadata
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/2158/metadata-parameter-value-arrays-for-rp
Having PRs declare all their supported parameter values is useful in contexts where the RP isn't the one making the decision
Mike is working on a small spec enabling this
Nat thought it's a reasonable thing to do
The Federation editors agreed with Stefan Santesson that this should be independent of the Federation spec
Do we want to be able to retrieve Entity Configurations with the Fetch Endpoint?
https://github.com/openid/federation/issues/30
Mike asked whether people have code that retrieves an Entity Configuration via the Fetch Endpoint
Rather than .well-known/openid-federation
The Fetch Endpoint is used to retrieve Subordinate Statements
An implementer pointed out that each API should do one thing
In this case, being about retrieving Subordinate Statements
Rather than also being used to retrieve Entity Configurations
Mike asked if people had code using Fetch to retrieve Entity Configurations
Dima doesn't use it for that
Mike said that the editors were leaning towards making Fetch only for Subordinate Statements
Dima welcomes the simplification
Mike put the question to the list after the last call
[Openid-specs-ab] Making the Fetch Endpoint specific to retrieving Subordinate Statements
Carin Alliance
Mike said that he'd been reached out to by the Carin Alliance about trust establishment with Federation
https://www.carinalliance.com/
They work on US healthcare standards
They use the Unified Data Access Profiles https://www.udap.org/
Tom reported that the Smart Health app uses OpenID Connect
Tom mentioned Blue Button https://bluebutton.cms.gov/developers/
He said that Blue Button can be used in Medicare to determine payment information
He said that there's problem with POST in Blue Button, which it doesn't allow
Tom described the Qualified Health Information Network
Tom said that they could use Federation
Tom also described PEFCA
Tom suggested asking Carin what the nodes are
Hospitals, Health Information Network, etc.
Mike is speaking with them this week
Next Call
The next call is Monday, August 19th at 4pm US Pacific Time
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20240813/4bb6c5e1/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-ab
mailing list