[Openid-specs-ab] Spec Call Notes 27-Nov-23
Michael Jones
michael_b_jones at hotmail.com
Tue Nov 28 00:06:02 UTC 2023
Spec Call Notes 27-Nov-23
Mike Jones
Victor Lu
Dima Postnikov
Tom Jones
DCP Pacific-friendly call time
There have been requests to institute a Pacific-friendly DCP call
As data points
This call is at 4pm Pacific Time
For Dima in Eastern Australia, this call is 10am. He could make 8am or 9am his time as well.
For New Zealand, this call is at noon
For Japan, this call is at 8am
Look for a Doodle poll
Dima led a discussion on allowed claims and Client Registration
He'd spoken with Nat and Mark Haine about it
ConnectID runs an ecosystem where a central authority accredits RPs
Including what claims they're eligible to receive
They're using a software_statement at client registration time
What to do if an RP requests a claim that it's not eligible for?
It's not an error to not receive a requested claim
Not having consent to release a claim is another reason to not return a claim
There's also unmet_authentication_requirements
https://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-unmet-authentication-requirements-1_0.html
RFC 6749 talks about being able to ignore scopes
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749.html#section-3.3
And it defines invalid_scope
The requested scope is invalid, unknown, or malformed.
Pull Requests
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/
PR #667: fix: [Federation] Subordinate Entity definition
Merged
PR #672: [Federation] Tighten Client Registration section
Merged
PR #673: [Federation] Tightened appendix examples
To be merged after resolving merge conflicts
PR #674: [Federation] security consideration - rewording and static trust chain
How can we prevent resource consumption attacks?
More reviews requested
Tom said that these are a form of denial of service attacks
Open Issues
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open&status=submitted&is_spam=!spam
#2088: [Federation] tls_client_auth as a request authentication method
Discussions on use of the Subject Alternative Name
Tom said that some of this information isn't even surfaced to the application
Mike wondered how these decisions relate to those made in https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8705.html
OAuth 2.0 Mutual-TLS Client Authentication and Certificate-Bound Access Tokens
It would be good to have John Bradley look at this
Next Call
The next call is scheduled for Thursday, November 30, 2024 at 7am Pacific Time
However this conflicts with the IESG telechat, so Mike will likely not be able to attend
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20231128/8c9867fe/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-ab
mailing list