[Openid-specs-ab] Issue #2086: Trust Mark Issuers (openid/connect)

rolandh issues-reply at bitbucket.org
Mon Nov 6 16:13:25 UTC 2023


New issue 2086: Trust Mark Issuers
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/2086/trust-mark-issuers

Roland  Hedberg:

In the specification it is stated that about the Entity Statement claim trust\_mark\_issuers:

“If the value list bound to a Trust Mark identifier is empty, anyone can issue Trust Marks with that identifier.”

Then is Section 5.3 Trust Marks this text appears:

“The fact that a Trust Mark Issuer is accepted by the federation is expressed in the `trust_marks_issuers` claim of the Trust Anchor.”

Obviously if these are general statements they are contradictory.

Now, also in Section 5.3, we have this line:

“Note that a federation MAY allow an Entity to self-sign some Trust Marks.”

To get ride of the contradiction of the first two statements we could replace the first statement with:

“If the value list bound to a Trust Mark identifier is empty, then that Trust Mark identifier can only be used in self-signed trust marks and any entity within the Federation can issue a Trust Marks with that identifier.”

and rewrite the second statement to be something like:

“The fact that a Trust Mark Issuer is accepted by the federation, to issue Trust Marks that are not self-signed, is expressed in the `trust_marks_issuers` claim of the Trust Anchor.

‌

Responsible: Roland  Hedberg



More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list