[Openid-specs-ab] Spec Call Notes 15-May-23

[Michael Jones]

Thanks for the reminder, Torsten.  Indeed the BLE spec has been adopted.

Shall I publish the current version as -00 to openid.net/specs/ or is there a previous set of sources/html output that should be -00?  Once we've published -00, we can reference it from https://openid.net/wg/connect/status/.

                                                       Thanks,
                                                       -- Mike

P.S.  Is it time for a call for adoption for the security analysis document?

From: torsten at lodderstedt.net <torsten at lodderstedt.net>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 1:08 PM
To: Artifact Binding/Connect Working Group <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>; Michael Jones <michael_b_jones at hotmail.com>
Cc: Kristina Yasuda <Kristina.Yasuda at microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Spec Call Notes 15-May-23

The call for adoption went out on 11/23/22 - look for "OpenID for Verifiable Presentations over BLE (Request for WG Adoption)".
Am 17. Mai 2023, 20:07 +0200 schrieb Michael Jones via Openid-specs-ab <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>>:

To avoid any ambiguity, a call-for-adoption e-mail should be sent to the working group, giving people two weeks to comment.  After it's adopted, the spec can then be added to the list of working group specifications at https://openid.net/wg/connect/status/.  If the editors believe it's ready for adoption, please let us know and any of the chairs can send that e-mail.

We should also consider adopting the security analysis document, if the authors of it think that it's time to do so.

                                                       -- Mike

From: Kristina Yasuda <Kristina.Yasuda at microsoft.com<mailto:Kristina.Yasuda at microsoft.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 10:10 AM
To: Artifact Binding/Connect Working Group <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>>
Cc: Michael Jones <michael_b_jones at hotmail.com<mailto:michael_b_jones at hotmail.com>>
Subject: RE: Spec Call Notes 15-May-23

Hi All,

The understanding of the editors of the BLE spec is that it was adopted. I could not find connect call minutes documenting that during my quick search, but we have been discussing the draft as an already adopted document, and no one has objected, for example in the attached email.

What is the idea behind "OpenID DID Method"?

Best,
Krisitna

From: Openid-specs-ab <openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net>> On Behalf Of Michael Jones via Openid-specs-ab
Sent: Monday, May 15, 2023 5:15 PM
To: openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
Cc: Michael Jones <michael_b_jones at hotmail.com<mailto:michael_b_jones at hotmail.com>>
Subject: [Openid-specs-ab] Spec Call Notes 15-May-23

Spec Call Notes 15-May-23

Mike Jones
Nat Sakimura
David Waite
Andres Olave - CTO of Velocity Network Foundation
Edmund Jay
Takahiko Kawasaki

Events and Initiatives
              EIC
                           OpenID4VC was a hot topic
                           On Friday, we held a liaison meeting with EC wallet participants
                           Joseph Heenan reported that he's starting OpenID4VP certification tests
                                         Nat observed that we still need to define exactly what tests will be included
                                         The tests will be based on a profile
                           There were discussions on the use of Federation for trust establishment in the context of EIDAS2

              Identiverse
                           Will be in two weeks
                           The board will meet
                                         Mike plans to propose process updates enabling the use of GitHub, etc.

OpenID for Verifiable Presentations over BLE
              A call for review went out on April 25th
                            https://openid.bitbucket.io/connect/openid-4-verifiable-presentations-over-ble-1_0.html
              We don't believe that a call for adoption has occurred yet

OpenID DID Method
              Giuseppe De Marco asked Nat and Mike about registering an OpenID DID method
              Nat suggested that this be in a working specification so we have clear control over it

PRs
              https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/
              PR #510: [Federation] introductionary text, metadata section, editorials
                           This is actively being worked on by the editors
              PR #518: feat: [Federation] trust_chain JWS header parameter
                           This is actively being worked on by the editors
                           Reviews are requested
              PR #513: add version to userinfo profile
                           Nat said that this should be -00 and the previous version should be revoked
                           Mike will update his PR comments accordingly
              PR #468: First draft of OpenID 4 VC Security Analysis
                           Nat said that it's probably time for working group adoption discussions

Open Issues
              https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open
              #1921: trust_chain as JWT header claim
                           This parallels having the "x5c" header parameter
                           Review requested

Next Call
              The next call will be Thursday, May 18 at 7am Pacific Time
_______________________________________________
Openid-specs-ab mailing list
Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net<mailto:Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
https://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20230518/cf80ac50/attachment-0001.html>