[Openid-specs-ab] SIOP and webauthn

[Nikos Fotiou]

Hi,

I have a question which is related to politics and standardization history.

I believe that SIOP (as defined in openid connect core) could have been used instead of WebAuthn. A combination of SIOP+ctap (rather than WebAuthn+ctap) would have more chances of getting adopted. So I was wondering how we came up with yet another API instead of adding support for SIOP to browsers. Did this ever occur as a possibility?

Best,
Nikos

--
Nikos Fotiou - https://www2.aueb.gr/users/fotiou/
Researcher - Mobile Multimedia Laboratory
Athens University of Economics and Business
https://mm.aueb.gr

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20230311/4261120a/attachment.p7s>