[Openid-specs-ab] Issue #1805: Heather Flanagan's comment on "note SHOULD also be taken to jwks " (openid/connect)

[mbj]

New issue 1805: Heather Flanagan's comment on "note SHOULD also be taken to jwks "
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1805/heather-flanagans-comment-on-note-should

Michael Jones:

About this paragraph:

> Again, the only thing we need is the federation\_fetch\_endpoint. As described in [Section 9.2](), note SHOULD also be taken to jwks as the Trust Anchor MAY be performing a key rollover. 

Heather wrote:

> Note should be taken to? Or note should be taken of? Might want to rethink how this sentence is structured.

The intended action on the part of the implementer needs to be more clearly described here.

‌