[Openid-specs-ab] SIOP Special Topic Call Notes 14-Jul-22

Joseph Heenan joseph at authlete.com
Thu Jul 14 16:05:24 UTC 2022


Attendees:

Joseph Heenan
Nat Sakimura
David Chadwick
Mike Jones
Justin Richer
Kristina Yasuda
Jeremie Miller
Roison Quadras
David Waite
George Fletcher


WG agreed to focus efforts to start Public Review Period for the First Implementer’s Draft for OpenID for VCI, and the Second Implementer’s Draft for OpenID for VPs and SIOPv2.

Some PRs are merged now:

o Merged PR #228 – Issuance restructure: diff too big, HTML for review attached
o Merged PR#227 – rename from `registration` to `client_metadata` parameter
o Merged PR#225 mid format identifiers

New issuance editor's draft available at https://openid.bitbucket.io/connect/openid-4-verifiable-credential-issuance-1_0.html.


https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/237

One minor clarification from David to be fixed; IANA considerations section to be put in required format by Kristina. Otherwise to merge if no further comments within next 7 days.

https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/235

To be merged if no further comments within next 7 days.

https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/236

Adds definition of ‘wallet’ to presentation / SIOP specs. Mike/George agreed.

https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/226

Some discussion about how this might work on iOS given the issues if more than one wallet is installed that claims the openid: scheme. George asked if it would be better to not use a custom scheme and instead require the user to use the correct wallet to scan the QR code. It was felt that using openid: in both cases means that we can’t have the situation were one wallet handles initiate-issuance and a different wallet handles authorization meaning separate custom URL schemes should be used for each case. DW raised concerns about the app stores potentially limiting the number of custom schemes an app can use. Kristina added a comment to the PR, George & DW to also add comments.


https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/229

Discussion about the distinction between types field & display name and if there’s a need to display ‘types’ to the user in some cases. David Chadwick to open a specific issue on that topic. Consensus to merge this one.



Kristina asked people to think about these issues ready for discussion next week:

https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1375 Credential Issuance: `retry_in` parameter for deferred credentials

https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1518 Where to include a presentation submission

https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues/1550 Clarification of simplified verification flow required - Kristina hopes to raise a PR for this one.




More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list