[Openid-specs-ab] Spec Call Notes 16-Dec-21
Mike Jones
Michael.Jones at microsoft.com
Thu Dec 16 19:51:02 UTC 2021
Spec Call Notes 16-Dec-21
Brian Campbell
Mike Jones
David Chadwick
Kristina Yasuda
Giuseppe De Marco
Roland Hedberg
Filip Skokan
Thomas Bellebaum
Joseph Heenan
Tom Jones
Bjorn Hjelm
Proposed Implementer's Drafts of SIOP V2 and OIDC4VP
We have merged several PRs addressing review feedback received
3 remain open
We plan to start the Foundation-wide review Friday afternoon
Proposed Account Creation Implementer's Draft
Review will start at same time
Credential Issuance Specification
Will be discussed primarily during the SIOP Special Topic calls
A "Credential Issuance" component tag was added to the Bitbucket issue tracker
OpenID Connect Federation Issues
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open&component=Federation
1365: Do we need a special JWT type
Mike will work with Roland to add appropriate text
1373: Definition of the Entity Statement
Mike will create updated text
1358: Search Query
Mike said that code can already implement its own custom search operations
Roland said that we already have list operations to facilitate search
There was consensus on the call to close the issue on that basis
1366: Support for "immediate" exclusion of an entity from a federation
The point of this is to be able to say that an entity is no longer valid in the federation
This would require revocation and/or introspection features
Mike said that if this is added, this should be optional
Giuseppe will write a pull request adding this feature
David Chadwick said that they've implemented something like this in their system
1368: [federation_api] fetch entity statement - issuer parameter is really required?
Giuseppe would like the "iss" to be implicit
Roland said that if you don't provide an issuer, then the issuer would be the one at the fetch endpoint
Mike wants John Bradley to do a security review of the possibility of the issuer being optional
Roland said that there's currently one endpoint with multiple operations
He asked potential implementers whether each operation should have its own endpoint
Giuseppe said that some of the endpoints would be optional
Mike said that this would break every implementation so we shouldn't do it without a compelling reason
Roland asked Brian, Filip, and Joseph if they had an option. None did.
Roland will file a new issue about this
Open Pull Requests
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/pull-requests/
None were individually discussed on the call
Open Issues
https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open
No additional issues were discussed beyond the Federation issues above
Next Call
We'll take the next two weeks off for the holidays
The next call will be on Monday, January 3, 2022 at 3pm Pacific Time
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20211216/b305e26f/attachment.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-ab
mailing list