[Openid-specs-ab] Regrets for today's WG call

[Karl McGuinness]

Hi George,

> 2. What do we want to do with the Native SSO draft spec. Is there enough interest to continue to carry it forward?

Okta has implemented this draft and its being used by some large customers.  We would be interested to see this move forward.

https://developer.okta.com/blog/2021/11/12/native-sso <https://developer.okta.com/blog/2021/11/12/native-sso>

Thanks,
Karl

> On Dec 2, 2021, at 6:57 AM, George Fletcher via Openid-specs-ab <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> This message originated outside your organization.
> 
> There are two things I'd like to get WG feedback on and we can do this via email or at the next call...
> 
> 1. Can we take the "prompt=create" spec to implementors draft and if not, what is left to be done to get to that stage?
> 
> 2. What do we want to do with the

> . Is there enough interest to continue to carry it forward?
> 
> Thanks,
> George
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20211202/4bd240e0/attachment.html>