[Openid-specs-ab] [EXTERNAL] Re: Spec Call Notes 5-Apr-21

[Mike Jones]

The extra call is at 8am Tuesday Japan Time - which is currently 4pm Monday Pacific Time. This is the same as the regular call that it alternates weeks with.

-- Mike
________________________________
From: Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones at gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 4:55:36 PM
To: Artifact Binding/Connect Working Group <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
Cc: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Spec Call Notes 5-Apr-21

sorry i missed the meeting. I guess I still have the time wrong. I even checked the open calendar.
What time is the meeting in PDT?
Be the change you want to see in the world ..tom


On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 4:50 PM Mike Jones via Openid-specs-ab <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>> wrote:

Spec Call Notes 5-Apr-21



Nat Sakimura

Mike Jones

David Waite

Vittorio Bertocci

Jeremie Miller

Edmund Jay

Kristina Yasuda

Tim Cappalli



Working Group Status Page Updates

              Mike updated the working group status page

                            https://openid.net/wg/connect/status/

              Newly adopted drafts were added

              Active working group members were updated



OpenID Connect Federation Spec

              Published draft -14, incorporating feedback from last year's three interop events

              The spec may be nearing final status

              People are encouraged to review the spec now

                           Particularly, look at changes in history entries from the last three releases

              We should discuss the spec status and next steps on the next European-friendly call

                           This will be Thursday, April 8th, 2021 at 7am Pacific Time



Claims Aggregation Spec

              Edmund is reviewing the credential provider draft

                           Apparently they're working on down-scoping

              Both drafts are trying to pass claims from Claims Providers to RPs

              Nat wants to review the credential provider draft

              Note that the credential provider draft hasn't yet been contributed to the working group



Open Issues

              https://bitbucket.org/openid/connect/issues?status=new&status=open

              #1214: Certification: remove requirement for RP to support unsigned jwt

                           To be consistent, we should probably allow RPs to pass with only a warning if they don’t support unsigned ID Tokens

              #1213: private_key_jwt, client_secret_jwt audience

                           Filip summarized discussions from the 25-Mar-21 call in an issue comment

                           We discussed that it should remain an error if the Token Endpoint value isn't supported

                                         and that it should be a warning if the Issuer value isn't supported

              #1217: Require JAR in SIOP to strongly ID the Relying Party

                           It's not clear what attack this proposal is intended to mitigate

                           Deferred discussion until Tom is on the call



SIOP Special Call

              Kristina reported on discussions from the last SIOP Special Call

              One topic discussed was how End-Users could select which SIOP to use



Next Calls

              The next regular Connect call is on Thursday, April 8th, 2021 at 7am Pacific Time



_______________________________________________
Openid-specs-ab mailing list
Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net<mailto:Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20210406/f6bb8101/attachment.html>