[Openid-specs-ab] Please Either ABSTAIN or OBJECT from the Federation Spec Vote

[Nick Roy]

Well, that was a private (not an oidc-specs-ab) email to you to let you 
know that there is further work being pursued on the R&E profiles, but 
it sounds like you aren't interested in working in an R&E working group. 
My understanding is that this WG will pursue R&E use cases for this 
profile. Since R&E is one of the largest users of multilateral SAML 
federation, I think exploring use of the OIDC Federation work in that 
space is a great next step.

Nick

On 7/18/18 9:47 AM, Mike Schwartz via Openid-specs-ab wrote:
> 
> Maybe Nick is right here... I think a WG specific to OIDC federation
> would be the right way to go. I think that's what I'm getting at--a
> forum where we could discuss major design decisions, instead of just
> moving to implementers draft where the editors might consider your
> feedback.
> 
> - Mike
> 
> 
> 
> On 2018-07-18 10:29, Nick Roy wrote:
>> You could suggest that the WG not be R&E-specific.
>>
> 
> 
>> On 7/18/18 9:00 AM, Mike Schwartz wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm not going to join an R&E specific WG.
>>>
> 
> 
>>> On 2018-07-18 09:54, Nick Roy wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The next step is to form a WG under the OIDF to more widely work on
>>>> the
>>>> profile. Please add your name as a proposer if you support forming
>>>> this
>>>> WG:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/daserzw/oidc-edu-wg/blob/master/charter.md
>>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>