[Openid-specs-ab] Session ID semantics aligned across OpenID Connect front-channel and back-channel logout specs

Brian Campbell bcampbell at pingidentity.com
Wed Aug 24 16:22:57 UTC 2016


I think we need to be careful with some of these assumptions. The exp on
the ID Token doesn't correlate to the timeouts or expiration of the session
the client establishes from the ID Token.  And there's no normative
requirements about the exp in an id_token_hint.

On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Mike Jones via Openid-specs-ab <
openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> wrote:

> I found your original logic to be sound.  The ID Token could be reused
> with id_token_hint until it expires. Communicating the matching expiration
> time in the logout made sense to me – particularly in the no Session ID
> case, as John points out.
>
>
>
> – Mike
>
>
>
> *From: *Phil Hunt (IDM) <phil.hunt at oracle.com>
> *Sent: *Wednesday, August 24, 2016 11:45 AM
> *To: *Phil Hunt (IDM) <phil.hunt at oracle.com>
> *Cc: *Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>;
> openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
>
> *Subject: *Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Session ID semantics aligned across
> OpenID Connect front-channel and back-channel logout specs
>
>
> Scratch that. Was thinking oauth resource and tokens.
>
> Not sure the same would exist here.
>
> Phil
>
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 8:17 AM, Phil Hunt (IDM) via Openid-specs-ab <
> openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>
> It may be useful to include the original session expiry time or make the
> exp match the original id token. If the service isn't tracking state of
> sessions it needs to know for how much longer an id token might show up in
> order to keep its revocation list managed over time.
>
> Phil
>
> On Aug 24, 2016, at 5:58 AM, Mike Jones via Openid-specs-ab <
> openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>
> Good catch, Filip.  I’d replaced “exp” (expiration time) with “iat”
> (issued at) to align it with the ID Events spec
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hunt-idevent-token-03.  But I’d also
> wanted to ask the working group – do we want to retain an explicit
> expiration time in the logout token?
>
>
>
>                                                        -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* Filip [mailto:panva.ip at gmail.com <panva.ip at gmail.com>]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 24, 2016 1:24 AM
> *To:* Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>
> *Cc:* openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> *Subject:* Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Session ID semantics aligned across
> OpenID Connect front-channel and back-channel logout specs
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> reviewing the changes i noticed in Section 2.4 of Backchannel draft 03 the
> 'exp' claim got removed from Logout Token claims, however section 4 still
> recomends OPs to use short expiration times for their Logout Tokens. It is
> not clear enough if 'exp' should be present or not.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> *Filip Skokan*
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Mike Jones via Openid-specs-ab <
> openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net> wrote:
>
> Session ID definitions in the OpenID Connect front-channel and
> back-channel logout specs have been aligned so that the Session ID
> definition is now the same in both specs.  The Session ID is scoped to the
> Issuer in both specs now (whereas it was previously global in scope in the
> front-channel spec).  This means that the issuer value now needs to be
> supplied whenever the Session ID is.  This doesn’t change the simple
> (no-parameter) front-channel logout messages.  The back-channel
> specification is now also aligned with the ID Event Token specification.
>
>
>
> The new specification versions are:
>
> ·       http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-frontchannel-1_0-01.html
>
> ·       http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-backchannel-1_0-03.html
>
>
>
>                                                        -- Mike
>
>
>
> P.S.  This notice was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1599 and
> as @selfissued <https://twitter.com/selfissued>.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20160824/e60b428b/attachment.html>


More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list