[Openid-specs-ab] Revisiting HTML Based Logout spec title

[Justin Richer]

+1 to “front channel” and “back channel”

> On Oct 6, 2015, at 5:25 AM, nov matake <nov at matake.jp <mailto:nov at matake.jp>> wrote:
> 
> I agree “HTTP-Based” is inappropriate.
> 
> Since both front-chanel logout spec and session management spec use iFrame, it can be confusing as nature,
> but I don’t think the name “iFrame-Based Logout” increase the confusion so much.
> 
> ps.
> Personally, I prefer “Front-channel Logout” as the pair spec with “Back-channel Logout”.
> 
>> On Oct 6, 2015, at 11:14, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com <mailto:Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> “iFrame Based Logout” more closely resembles Session Management – since Session Management requires an OP iframe to be loaded in every RP page.  We’ll cause more confusion that we’ll alleviate if we use that name.
>>  
>> I’m not saying we shouldn’t come up with a better name – we should.  But that that “iFrame Based Logout” isn’t that better name.
>>  
>>                                                             -- Mike
>>  
>> From: Openid-specs-ab [mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net <mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net>] On Behalf Of Nat Sakimura
>> Sent: Monday, October 05, 2015 4:46 PM
>> To: openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net <mailto:openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
>> Subject: [Openid-specs-ab] Revisiting HTML Based Logut spec title
>>  
>> Hi. 
>>  
>> The HTML Based logout spec title is currently 
>> "HTTP-Based Logout <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3a%2f%2fopenid.bitbucket.org%2fopenid-connect-logout-1_0.html&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7c20bdd6e5408d489d93ee08d2cddf2003%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=dXEqx4dhKWdQK8%2b1SsbYTmodM0%2fwqZA3Ng9k3Z4f%2fmQ%3d> "
>>  
>> As far as I understand, both the back-channel and this spec are "HTTP-Based". 
>> Session management also is ultimately HTTP-Based. 
>> So, naming it as "HTTP-Based Logout" seems to be inappropriate. 
>> I would rather call it as "iFrame Based Logout" or something like that. 
>> 
>> What do you guys thing. 
>>  
>> -- 
>> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
>> Chairman, OpenID Foundation
>> http://nat.sakimura.org/ <https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3a%2f%2fnat.sakimura.org%2f&data=01%7c01%7cMichael.Jones%40microsoft.com%7c20bdd6e5408d489d93ee08d2cddf2003%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=PXu3QQA%2byJWa3P%2fXD0N4tWFWI3H18TjWsG51IWKIe8g%3d>
>> @_nat_en
>> _______________________________________________
>> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
>> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net <mailto:Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
>> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab <http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net <mailto:Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20151006/cc1992cc/attachment.html>