[Openid-specs-ab] Issue #35: OP-I-2 SHOULD in OAuth but required here (openid/certification)

Ian Glazer issues-reply at bitbucket.org
Tue Jan 27 17:10:39 UTC 2015

Previous message (by thread): [Openid-specs-ab] Issue #34: OP-H-4 & OP-H-5 Clarity needed in instructions (openid/certification)
Next message (by thread): [Openid-specs-ab] Issue #36: OP-M-1 Why is the test looking for "registration_endpoint" in Basic test? (openid/certification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

New issue 35: OP-I-2 SHOULD in OAuth but required here
https://bitbucket.org/openid/certification/issue/35/op-i-2-should-in-oauth-but-required-here

Ian Glazer:

Revoking the previous token is a SHOULD in OAuth but this rest is requiring it. The test cannot be more prescriptive than the spec.

Previous message (by thread): [Openid-specs-ab] Issue #34: OP-H-4 & OP-H-5 Clarity needed in instructions (openid/certification)
Next message (by thread): [Openid-specs-ab] Issue #36: OP-M-1 Why is the test looking for "registration_endpoint" in Basic test? (openid/certification)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Openid-specs-ab mailing list