[Openid-specs-ab] Couple questions on the Certification of Conformance

[Mike Jones]

Example implementer’s information is now also included at http://openid.net/certification/submission/.

                                                            -- Mike

From: Openid-specs-ab [mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net] On Behalf Of Mike Jones
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 2:43 PM
To: Nat Sakimura
Cc: <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>; Mike Leszcz; Don Thibeau
Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Couple questions on the Certification of Conformance

Yes – the implementer and the signer may be different.  I’ll clarify that in the instructions.

From: Nat Sakimura [mailto:sakimura at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2015 2:31 PM
To: Mike Jones
Cc: Brian Campbell; <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>>; Mike Leszcz; Don Thibeau
Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Couple questions on the Certification of Conformance

So, I suppose the authorised contact and the authorised signer can be different.

Nat

2015-04-08 2:40 GMT+09:00 Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com<mailto:Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>>:
Example values for the blanks in the Certification of Conformance have been added to the submission instructions at http://openid.net/certification/submission/.  The examples given are:

•        Name of Entity (“Implementer”) Making this Certification: ProseWare

•        Software or Service (“Deployment”) Name & Version #: Humongous Identity 3.14159

•        OpenID Connect Conformance Profile: Basic OpenID Provider

•        Conformance Test Suite Software: op.certification.openid.net<http://op.certification.openid.net> as of April 12, 2015

•        Test Date: April 12, 2015

•        Authorized Signature: HQB

•        Name: Harry Q. Bovik

•        Title: Senior Computer Scientist

•        Date: April 13, 2015

The foundation takes no position on who is authorized to sign a certification request for an organization – in keeping with the self-certification nature of the program.  It’s up to the person signing to determine that they have the authority to do so within their organization in whatever way is appropriate within that organization.

In your case, Brian, certainly if Andre says that you can sign, then you can sign.  You may be comfortable getting authorization from another manager or authority within Ping Identity or you may be comfortable signing on your own authority on behalf of the corporation.  It’s completely up to you.

                                                            -- Mike

From: Openid-specs-ab [mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net>] On Behalf Of Brian Campbell
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2015 6:16 PM
To: <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net<mailto:openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>>
Subject: [Openid-specs-ab] Couple questions on the Certification of Conformance

What should be put in the "Conformance Test Suite Software:"? Is there some version identifier for the test suite that should go here? The test instance URL? Something else?
What kind of person should be listed as the "Implementer’s Authorized Contact Information"?  Is this the same as the person who provides the "Authorized Signature"? Or is it a technical contact? Or marketing/press contact? I'm not sure but I'm a bit hesitant to put myself there...




_______________________________________________
Openid-specs-ab mailing list
Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net<mailto:Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab



--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20150407/13409986/attachment.html>