[Openid-specs-ab] Ad-hoc conversation about i-names and OpenID Connect Migration 29-Aug-14
Nat Sakimura
sakimura at gmail.com
Thu Sep 4 02:54:10 UTC 2014
OK. Will try.
2014-09-04 1:53 GMT+09:00 Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>:
> Can all this be put into the draft by tomorrow morning’s call (in the
> Americas) so it can be reviewed then? I think that a note should be
> included that it’s not clear whether any XRI providers will become OpenID
> Connect Providers yet or not.
>
>
>
> -- Mike
>
>
>
> *From:* openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net [mailto:
> openid-specs-ab-bounces at lists.openid.net] *On Behalf Of *Nat Sakimura
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 03, 2014 8:55 AM
> *To:* John Bradley
> *Cc:* Michael Schwartz; openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Ad-hoc conversation about i-names and
> OpenID Connect Migration 29-Aug-14
>
>
>
> Good point about my solution is that it is completely independent of
> whatever the XRI providers does, unless they shut down the forwarding
> service.
>
>
>
> As long as the forwarding service is supported, I can specify
> https://accounts.google.com as (+openid_iss) and I am done if google
> allows external canonical ID to be mapped to its OpenID Connect ID. Of
> course, I can set up id.sakimura.org and point (+openid_iss) to it as
> well.
>
> If Fullxri decides to support OpenID Connect, then he can create a default
> map for (+openid_iss) to its users.
>
> Fullxri can make an independent decision on it. This kind of "distributed
> governance" in fact is very much in-line with the original concept of user
> centricity :-)
>
>
>
> That's the beauty of this solution.
>
>
>
> Nat
>
>
>
> 2014-09-04 0:13 GMT+09:00 John Bradley <ve7jtb at ve7jtb.com>:
>
> Markus indicated that Respect Networks is not planning on doing Connect.
>
> I don't think we have had input from them directly at this point.
>
> John B.
>
>
> On Sep 3, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Michael Schwartz <mike at gluu.org> wrote:
>
> > Nat,
> >
> > If Markus is ok with the changes, then I'm ok with it. Does it align
> with XRI as currently conceived by Respect Networks?
> >
> > - Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------
> > Michael Schwartz
> > CEO Gluu
> >
> >
> >> Message: 2
> >> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 12:39:23 +0900
> >> From: Nat Sakimura <n-sakimura at nri.co.jp>
> >> To: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>, Markus Sabadello
> >> <markus.sabadello at gmail.com>
> >> Cc: "openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net"
> >> <openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net>
> >> Subject: Re: [Openid-specs-ab] Ad-hoc conversation about i-names and
> >> OpenID Connect Migration 29-Aug-14
> >> Message-ID: <20140903123923.24425e3f1a08a945e78af87a at nri.co.jp>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> >> For what is worth,unlike I had hoped for, XRI would need a special
> casing.
> >> Also, whether xri.net would support this spec is unclear.
> >> Best compromise that I can think of right now is to use the forwarding
> >> service of XRI.
> >> Forwarding service is a service that XRI providers needs to implement.
> >> You can create a node under your XRI to point to another location.
> >> For example, I can define
> >> =nat/(+contact)
> >> to forward it to a contact page of my choice.
> >> Similarly, I could create
> >> =nat/(+openid_iss)
> >> and map it to any page.
> >> For example, if my OpenID Connect issuer is https://example.com/
> >> then I can define =nat/(+openid_iss) to map to https://example.com/.
> >> It works this way.
> >> 1) The client sends request to https://xri.net/=nat/(+openid_iss).
> >> 2) The host xri.net responds with 302 redirect to for example,
> >> http://forwarding.fullxri.com/forwading/=nat/(+openid_iss)
> >> 3) The client send request to it.
> >> 4) The host replies with 302 redirect to
> >> https://example.com/
> >> 5) The client requests https://example.com/.
> >> 6) The page returns 200 OK so the redirection sequence terminates here.
> >> 7) Now the client has found that https://example.com/ is the
> >> authoritative OpenID Connect issuer.
> >> 8) Match it to the value of "iss" in the ID Token.
> >> This should work with any XRI provider without xri.net doing something.
> >> Thoughts?
> >> Nat
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> > Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> > http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openid-specs-ab mailing list
> Openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> http://lists.openid.net/mailman/listinfo/openid-specs-ab
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Nat Sakimura (=nat)
>
> Chairman, OpenID Foundation
> http://nat.sakimura.org/
> @_nat_en
>
--
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openid.net/pipermail/openid-specs-ab/attachments/20140904/0fff5b48/attachment.html>
More information about the Openid-specs-ab
mailing list